Bug 1328721
Summary: | [Tiering]: promotion of files may not be balanced on distributed hot tier when promoting files with size as that of max.mb | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | krishnaram Karthick <kramdoss> | |
Component: | tier | Assignee: | sankarshan <sankarshan> | |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | krishnaram Karthick <kramdoss> | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | rhgs-3.1 | CC: | asrivast, dlambrig, nbalacha, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, sankarshan, storage-qa-internal | |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | ZStream | |
Target Release: | RHGS 3.1.3 | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.7.9-4 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1330353 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-06-23 05:18:39 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1311817, 1330353, 1332138 |
Description
krishnaram Karthick
2016-04-20 07:28:35 UTC
Please note that this will also be seen with demotion. upstream patch http://review.gluster.org/14068 https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/73415/ Downstream patch verified the fix in build - glusterfs-server-3.7.9-4.el7rhgs.x86_64 steps followed t verify: 1) Had 20 x 5 GB files in a EC volume 2) Attached a 4x1 hot tier, max.mb and max.files were left as default 3) constantly heated all 20 files 4) Files are no more promoted to only one sub-volume. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1240 |