Bug 1329062
Summary: | Inconsistent directory structure on dht subvols caused by parent layouts going stale during entry create operations because of fix-layout | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Raghavendra G <rgowdapp> |
Component: | distribute | Assignee: | bugs <bugs> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.7.11 | CC: | bugs, rkavunga |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.7.12 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1323040 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2016-06-28 12:14:39 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1323040 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1323042 |
Description
Raghavendra G
2016-04-21 05:18:06 UTC
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14040 (cluster/distribute: detect stale layouts in entry fops) posted (#6) for review on release-3.7 by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp) REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14040 (cluster/distribute: detect stale layouts in entry fops) posted (#7) for review on release-3.7 by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp) COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/14040 committed in release-3.7 by Raghavendra G (rgowdapp) ------ commit 0ce1a038ab54a52a0c295e830abe035d4113ba83 Author: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp> Date: Fri Apr 1 15:16:23 2016 +0530 cluster/distribute: detect stale layouts in entry fops dht_mkdir () { first-hashed-subvol = hashed-subvol for "bname" in in-memory layout of "parent"; inodelk (SETLKW, parent, "LAYOUT_HEAL_DOMAIN", "can be any subvol, but we choose first-hashed-subvol randomly"); { begin: hashed-subvol = hashed-subvol for "bname" in in-memory layout of "parent"; hash-range = extract hashe-range from layout of "parent"; ret = mkdir (parent/bname, hashed-subvol, hash-range); if (ret == "hash-value doesn't fall into layout stored on the brick (this error is returned by posix-mkdir)") { refresh_parent_layout (); goto begin; } } inodelk (UNLCK, parent, "LAYOUT_HEAL_DOMAIN", "first-hashed-subvol"); proceed with other parts of dht_mkdir; } posix_mkdir (parent/bname, client-hash-range) { disk-hash-range = getxattr (parent, "dht-layout-key"); if (disk-hash-range != client-hash-range) { fail-with-error ("hash-value doesn't fall into layout stored on the brick"); return 0; } continue-with-posix-mkdir; } Similar changes need to be done for dentry operations like create, symlink, link, unlink, rmdir, rename. These will be addressed in subsequent patches. This patch addresses only mkdir codepath. This change breaks stripe tests, as on some striped subvols dht layout xattrs are not set for some reason. This results in failure of mkdir. Since striped volumes are always created with dht, some tests associated with stripe also fail. So, I am making following tests changes (since stripe is out of maintainance): * modify ./tests/basic/rpc-coverage.t to not to use striped volumes * mark all (2) tests in tests/bugs/stripe/ as bad tests Change-Id: Idd1ae879f24a48303dc743c1bb4d91f89a629e25 BUG: 1329062 Signed-off-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/14040 Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.com> This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.7.12, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.7.12 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2016-June/049918.html [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.gluster.user |