Bug 1330220
Summary: | Documentation bug: Red Hat Ceph Storage for the Overcloud | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Andreas Karis <akaris> |
Component: | documentation | Assignee: | Dan Macpherson <dmacpher> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 8.0 (Liberty) | CC: | akaris, cjanisze, djuran, dmacpher, lbopf, lmartins, mburns, mcornea, rhel-osp-director-maint, rkharwar, srevivo |
Target Milestone: | ga | Keywords: | Documentation |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-06-16 04:46:05 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Andreas Karis
2016-04-25 16:21:25 UTC
*** Bug 1329719 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Hi Adreas, Confirming that the data is now stored in Swift and I'll need to rectify the documentation for this. However, I might need some clarification with how the hints are used with the swift objects, including "name". I had a look at one of my test nodes following what you proposed. However, the data in the extra_hardware-* objects don't seem to contain all the hints, not just "name". For example, there doesn't seem to be fields for "model", "serial", or the "wwn*" fields. I thought this was a little odd, so I looked at the standard inspector_data-* objects. I found a section in the JSON that had the following: "disks": [ { "size": 53687091200, "rotational": true, "vendor": "0x1af4", "name": "/dev/vda", "wwn_vendor_extension": null, "wwn_with_extension": null, "model": "", "wwn": null, "serial": null } ], I also checked on a multi-disk node and found the following: "disks": [ { "size": 53687091200, "rotational": true, "vendor": "0x1af4", "name": "/dev/vda", "wwn_vendor_extension": null, "wwn_with_extension": null, "model": "", "wwn": null, "serial": null }, { "size": 53687091200, "rotational": true, "vendor": "0x1af4", "name": "/dev/vdb", "wwn_vendor_extension": null, "wwn_with_extension": null, "model": "", "wwn": null, "serial": null }, { "size": 53687091200, "rotational": true, "vendor": "0x1af4", "name": "/dev/vdc", "wwn_vendor_extension": null, "wwn_with_extension": null, "model": "", "wwn": null, "serial": null } ], I looks like the the hints for the root disk are checked against data in the inspector_data-* objects, not the extra_hardware-* objects. Is there any chance you can confirm this? Needinfo'ing Lucas from the Ironic team -- Lucas, any chance you can confirm this too? Thanks, Ruchika. Have updated accordingly. No response in over a month in response to comment #4. THe changes have been pushed to the portal, so I'll be closing this BZ. However, feel free to reopen if further changes to this section are required. |