Bug 1330969

Summary:	match the OEM ID and OEM Table ID fields of the FADT and the RSDT to those of the SLIC
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7	Reporter:	Ademar Reis <areis>
Component:	qemu-kvm	Assignee:	Laszlo Ersek <lersek>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Guo, Zhiyi <zhguo>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	7.1	CC:	alex3kov, bloch, chayang, ehabkost, gbailey, gklein, huding, juzhang, knoel, lersek, lijin, makhomed, martin, Michael, michen, mprivozn, mst, obockows, pbonzini, rbalakri, rjones, s.kieske, virt-bugs, virt-maint, xfu
Target Milestone:	pre-dev-freeze
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	qemu-kvm-1.5.3-112.el7	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:	undefined	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:	1248758	Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-11-03 20:11:53 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1248758
Bug Blocks:	1327537

Comment 3 Laszlo Ersek 2016-05-11 12:27:46 UTC

Note for QE:

In his downstream v1 review, Michael recommended that I backport upstream 53db092ad1c8 as well.

I just did; that change however implies a small change to the test steps I wrote up in bug 1248758 comment 42 (and this difference is specific to the RHEL-7.3 qemu-kvm backport): for the DSDT table, most of the fields (OEM ID, OEM Table ID, ASL Compiler fields etc) will change with this bugfix *unconditionally* (regardless of the presence of a SLIC table). Namely:

-ACPI: DSDT ... 01137 (v01   BXPC   BXDSDT 00000001 INTL 20150619)
+ACPI: DSDT ... 01137 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCDSDT 00000001 BXPC 00000001)

So this modifies points (7) and (8), when bug 1248758 comment 42 is applied for testing the RHEL-7.3 qemu-kvm backport. Thanks.

Comment 5 Miroslav Rezanina 2016-05-16 08:06:55 UTC

Fix included in qemu-kvm-1.5.3-112.el7

Comment 7 Laszlo Ersek 2016-06-18 15:43:59 UTC

Note for QE: when verifying this BZ, no regression testing is necessary beyond what I have already written up in comment 3 here, and in bug 1248758 comment 42. (That item already contains regression tests.) Thanks.

Comment 8 Guo, Zhiyi 2016-09-12 07:00:27 UTC

Reproduce against qemu-kvm-1.5.3-111.el7.x86_64 and verified against qemu-kvm-1.5.3-122.el7.x86_64.

Test against rhel7.3 host, from (7) of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758#c42
Results:
-ACPI: RSDT 000000003ffffabf 00034 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCRSDT 00000001 BXPC 00000001)
-ACPI: FACP 000000003ffff177 00074 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCFACP 00000001 BXPC 00000001)
-ACPI: DSDT 000000003fffe040 01137 (v01   BXPC   BXDSDT 00000001 INTL 20150619)
+ACPI: RSDT 000000003ffffabf 00034 (v01 ABRACA DABRAXYZ 00000001 BXPC 00000001)
+ACPI: FACP 000000003ffff177 00074 (v01 ABRACA DABRAXYZ 00000001 BXPC 00000001)
+ACPI: DSDT 000000003fffe040 01137 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCDSDT 00000001 BXPC 00000001)

Comment 9 Guo, Zhiyi 2016-09-12 07:01:10 UTC

Per comment 3 and comment 8, move to verified

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-03 20:11:53 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2585.html