Bug 1330969

Summary: match the OEM ID and OEM Table ID fields of the FADT and the RSDT to those of the SLIC
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Ademar Reis <areis>
Component: qemu-kvmAssignee: Laszlo Ersek <lersek>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Guo, Zhiyi <zhguo>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.1CC: alex3kov, bloch, chayang, ehabkost, gbailey, gklein, gmm, huding, juzhang, knoel, lersek, lijin, martin, Michael, michen, mprivozn, mst, obockows, pbonzini, rbalakri, rjones, s.kieske, virt-bugs, virt-maint, xfu
Target Milestone: pre-dev-freeze   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: qemu-kvm-1.5.3-112.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1248758 Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-03 20:11:53 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 1248758    
Bug Blocks: 1327537    

Comment 3 Laszlo Ersek 2016-05-11 12:27:46 UTC
Note for QE:

In his downstream v1 review, Michael recommended that I backport upstream 53db092ad1c8 as well.

I just did; that change however implies a small change to the test steps I wrote up in bug 1248758 comment 42 (and this difference is specific to the RHEL-7.3 qemu-kvm backport): for the DSDT table, most of the fields (OEM ID, OEM Table ID, ASL Compiler fields etc) will change with this bugfix *unconditionally* (regardless of the presence of a SLIC table). Namely:

-ACPI: DSDT ... 01137 (v01   BXPC   BXDSDT 00000001 INTL 20150619)
+ACPI: DSDT ... 01137 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCDSDT 00000001 BXPC 00000001)

So this modifies points (7) and (8), when bug 1248758 comment 42 is applied for testing the RHEL-7.3 qemu-kvm backport. Thanks.

Comment 5 Miroslav Rezanina 2016-05-16 08:06:55 UTC
Fix included in qemu-kvm-1.5.3-112.el7

Comment 7 Laszlo Ersek 2016-06-18 15:43:59 UTC
Note for QE: when verifying this BZ, no regression testing is necessary beyond what I have already written up in comment 3 here, and in bug 1248758 comment 42. (That item already contains regression tests.) Thanks.

Comment 8 Guo, Zhiyi 2016-09-12 07:00:27 UTC
Reproduce against qemu-kvm-1.5.3-111.el7.x86_64 and verified against qemu-kvm-1.5.3-122.el7.x86_64.

Test against rhel7.3 host, from (7) of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758#c42
-ACPI: RSDT 000000003ffffabf 00034 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCRSDT 00000001 BXPC 00000001)
-ACPI: FACP 000000003ffff177 00074 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCFACP 00000001 BXPC 00000001)
-ACPI: DSDT 000000003fffe040 01137 (v01   BXPC   BXDSDT 00000001 INTL 20150619)
+ACPI: RSDT 000000003ffffabf 00034 (v01 ABRACA DABRAXYZ 00000001 BXPC 00000001)
+ACPI: FACP 000000003ffff177 00074 (v01 ABRACA DABRAXYZ 00000001 BXPC 00000001)
+ACPI: DSDT 000000003fffe040 01137 (v01 BOCHS  BXPCDSDT 00000001 BXPC 00000001)

Comment 9 Guo, Zhiyi 2016-09-12 07:01:10 UTC
Per comment 3 and comment 8, move to verified

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-03 20:11:53 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.