| Summary: | QEMU: memory-backend-file doesn't fall back to regular RAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Yumei Huang <yuhuang> |
| Component: | qemu-kvm-rhev | Assignee: | Igor Mammedov <imammedo> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 7.3 | CC: | chayang, juzhang, knoel, michen, qzhang, virt-maint, xfu |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-08-09 13:57:54 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Yumei Huang
2016-04-28 09:52:17 UTC
Igor, shouldn't memory-backend-file fall back to regular RAM the same way -mem-path does? If not, then I think it's a good idea to document the difference in semantics in the manpage. (In reply to Luiz Capitulino from comment #2) > Igor, shouldn't memory-backend-file fall back to regular RAM the same way > -mem-path does? If not, then I think it's a good idea to document the > difference in semantics in the manpage. I don't think that it ever did nor should, it's configuration error and user should fix it either by switching to ram backend or allocating more hugepages instead of silent fallback and getting performance regressions. I'd do the same for -mem-path, but that would break 'broken' setups out there so it can't be fixed and we have to live with it. |