Bug 1331874

Summary: [RFE] Could we have gluster volume start ensure that individual bricks are included in /etc/updatedb.conf exclusions?
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Peter Portante <pportant>
Component: glusterdAssignee: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: storage-qa-internal <storage-qa-internal>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rhgs-3.1CC: rhs-bugs, storage-qa-internal, vbellur
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature, ZStream
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-12-21 06:40:38 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Peter Portante 2016-04-29 21:07:18 UTC
Would it be possible to have gluster ensure that /etc/updatedb.conf contain all the disks participating as bricks in the /etc/updatedb.conf?  Or at least issue a warning to the user notifying them?

I almost had 3 of the 6 nodes in the cluster fill up their system disks with large updatedb databases.

Comment 2 Atin Mukherjee 2016-04-30 07:09:17 UTC
I think this has to be an admin's job or the utility which configures the brick mount points before they can be used by gluster volumes as glusterd refers to the brick path, not the underlying file system for its volume life cycle. Thoughts?