| Summary: | [RFE] Could we have gluster volume start ensure that individual bricks are included in /etc/updatedb.conf exclusions? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Peter Portante <pportant> |
| Component: | glusterd | Assignee: | Atin Mukherjee <amukherj> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | storage-qa-internal <storage-qa-internal> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | rhgs-3.1 | CC: | rhs-bugs, storage-qa-internal, vbellur |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, ZStream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-12-21 06:40:38 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Peter Portante
2016-04-29 21:07:18 UTC
I think this has to be an admin's job or the utility which configures the brick mount points before they can be used by gluster volumes as glusterd refers to the brick path, not the underlying file system for its volume life cycle. Thoughts? |