Bug 1332466

Summary: Should show rhev-h ng information for "OS Version" in rhevm
Product: [oVirt] vdsm Reporter: Huijuan Zhao <huzhao>
Component: GeneralAssignee: Eli Mesika <emesika>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Huijuan Zhao <huzhao>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.17.27CC: bugs, cshao, fdeutsch, fkong, huiwa, leiwang, rbarry, weiwang, yaniwang, ycui
Target Milestone: ovirt-4.0.0-rcFlags: fdeutsch: ovirt-4.0.0?
rule-engine: planning_ack?
rule-engine: devel_ack?
ycui: testing_ack+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-09 11:04:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: Infra RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Attachments:
Description Flags
screenshot of OS version show none

Description Huijuan Zhao 2016-05-03 09:27:48 UTC
Created attachment 1153301 [details]
screenshot of OS version show

Description of problem:
It shows "RHEL - 3.6 - 0.20.el7" for "OS Version" in rhevm, should show rhev-h ng information for "OS Version" in rhevm.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhev-hypervisor7-ng-3.6-20160429.0.x86_64
imgbased-0.6-0.1.el7ev.noarch
vdsm-4.17.27-0.el7ev.noarch
Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Version: 3.6.6-0.1.el6

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install rhev-hypervisor7-ng-3.6-20160429.0.x86_64.
2. Add rhev-h ng to rhevm 3.6
3. In rhevm 3.6, enter Host page -> Software tab, focus on "OS Version"

Actual results:
1. After step3, it shows "RHEL - 3.6 - 0.20.el7"

Expected results:
1. After step3, it should show rhev-h ng information for "OS Version"

Additional info:

Comment 1 Dan Kenigsberg 2016-06-09 10:46:38 UTC
Fabian, this is unrelated to Network. I believe it is a dup of bug 1324447

Comment 2 Fabian Deutsch 2016-06-09 11:04:15 UTC
Yes, sounds like a dupe of that one.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1324447 ***