Bug 1332696
Summary: | krb5-libs canonicalizes hostnames for server principals breaking CNAME usage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Mark Shields <laebshade> | ||||
Component: | krb5 | Assignee: | Robbie Harwood <rharwood> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Dalibor Pospíšil <dapospis> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 6.7 | CC: | dpal, jplans, nalin, pkis | ||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | krb5-1.10.3-60.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2017-03-21 10:03:19 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Mark Shields
2016-05-03 19:46:48 UTC
This is a backported feature present on EL7 and in newer versions of krb5. Hi, thank you for the detailed bug report and patch. I will try to include a fix in the next release. Thank you! Do you have an ETA for the next CentOS 6.x release? (In reply to Mark Shields from comment #3) > Thank you! Do you have an ETA for the next CentOS 6.x release? CentOS as I understand it will release at about the same time RHEL releases; I don't believe it's publicly decided when that will be, but you can get a good idea of the timeframe we're talking about from wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_hat_enterprise_linux#Version_history We are too late to make 6.8, but I'm targeting 6.9. Unfortunately, I'm not strongly involved in the CentOS process itself. If this were a Fedora bug I could fix it instanter, but RHEL is slower-moving than that. I understand. Do you have an ETA for RHEL 6.9 release? I do not believe one is public yet, but it will probably follow the chart above. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0643.html |