Bug 1332703

Summary:	[DOC] Incorrect arcitecture examples in OpenStack 8 architecture guide
Product:	Red Hat OpenStack	Reporter:	jliberma <jliberma>
Component:	documentation	Assignee:	RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	RHOS Documentation Team <rhos-docs>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	8.0 (Liberty)	CC:	ccopello, mburns, slinaber, srevivo
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Documentation, ZStream
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	Chapter 4 of the OpenStack Architecture guide is misleading because most of the designs include features that are not supported / tech preview / or cannot be deployed by OSP director.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-01-07 18:38:40 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:

Description jliberma@redhat.com 2016-05-03 20:44:14 UTC

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-openstack-platform/8/architecture-guide/chapter-4-architecture-examples

Chapter 4 of the OpenStack Architecture guide is misleading because most of the designs include features that are not supported / tech preview / or cannot be deployed by OSP director.

A few examples:
- Nova cells
- Trove
- Object storage gateway servers on distinct nodes from the OpenStack controllers
- etc.

Ideally the document should be corrected to align with our recommended architecture as deployed by OSP director.

If that is not possible language should be added that these are generic OpenStack recommendations that do not imply support by Red Hat.

If neither is possible the document should be pulled. 

Re-branding upstream documents as Red Hat documents is a bad practice generally because the upstream documents can include features and designs that we do not recommend, have not tested, cannot provide, or do not support.