Bug 1332881
Summary: | Storage isn't properly deleted | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Juan Hernández <juan.hernandez> |
Component: | ovirt-engine | Assignee: | Daniel Erez <derez> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Ilanit Stein <istein> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.6.0 | CC: | acanan, amureini, dajohnso, derez, fdewaley, gblomqui, gklein, jfrey, jhardy, jocarter, juan.hernandez, lsurette, obarenbo, oourfali, ratamir, rbalakri, Rhev-m-bugs, soconcar, srevivo, ykaul |
Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.0.0-rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1328087 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2016-05-25 11:55:50 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Comment 1
Allon Mureinik
2016-05-05 07:38:38 UTC
According to Felix and Sergio they deleted a NFS storage domain, using the GUI. Then they tried to add it again (same server, same path, etc) and the system refused to add it saying that it was already configured. That is what induced them to delete it from the database. So the first action item is to check if this can really happen. I wasn't able to reproduce it in my environment. Daniel - please take a look at this. I can't think of a "real" way to reproduce this, at least not in new engine versions, but please keep me honest. oVirt 4.0 Alpha has been released, moving to oVirt 4.0 Beta target. (In reply to Allon Mureinik from comment #3) > Daniel - please take a look at this. I can't think of a "real" way to > reproduce this, at least not in new engine versions, but please keep me > honest. It could be an issue of a failure with cleaning storage connection, we had a few similar issues in previous versions, it should be already resolved in new engine versions. I've couldn't reproduce the issue on latest build, please reopen if reproduced again. |