Bug 1333695
| Summary: | gcc build inconsistency - FTBFS in gas/config/tc-arm.c | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dan Horák <dan> | ||||
| Component: | cross-binutils | Assignee: | David Howells <dhowells> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | dan, davejohansen, dhowells, jakub, jwakely, law, mpolacek, nickc | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | ppc64 | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc24 cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc22 cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc23 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-05-20 17:41:19 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 467765, 1071880 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Created attachment 1154545 [details]
Proposed patch
Hi Guys,
I am currently unable to reproduce this problem locally, but a fix for the
problem looks to be simple enough. Could somebody please try out this patch
and let me know if it works ?
Cheers
Nick
Looks good if I see correctly, the build is still running, but it's over the arm cross tools. What version of gcc? I presume it's the system gcc in each case? It should be noted that this builds fine for i386, x86_64 and armv7hl. If you use -Werror, you need to deal with potential false positives. (In reply to David Howells from comment #3) > What version of gcc? I presume it's the system gcc in each case? gcc-6.1.1-1.fc25.s390x and gcc-6.0.0-0.19.fc24.s390, so seems gcc6 related > It should be noted that this builds fine for i386, x86_64 and armv7hl. right, also ok on aarch64 FYI - this problem has now been fixed in the upstream sources by this patch: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2016-04/msg00466.html Right - I have now checked the patch in. So the fix should be available in: binutils-2.26-19.fc24 binutils-2.26-21.fc25 Reverting to assigned as the bug is against cross-binutils, not binutils. cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e8448104d4 cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c071ab54c4 cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-db2289fd5b cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-db2289fd5b cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c071ab54c4 cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e8448104d4 cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. cross-binutils-2.26-8.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |
Build fails on ppc64/pcc64le, s390(x) because of ... gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../binutils-2.26/gas -I. -I../../binutils-2.26/gas -I../bfd -I../../binutils-2.26/gas/config -I../../binutils-2.26/gas/../include -I../../binutils-2.26/gas/.. -I../../binutils-2.26/gas/../bfd -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/share/locale\"" -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -Werror -I../../binutils-2.26/gas/../zlib -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -m64 -mcpu=power8 -mtune=power8 -Wno-unused-const-variable -c -o tc-arm.o `test -f 'config/tc-arm.c' || echo '../../binutils-2.26/gas/'`config/tc-arm.c ../../binutils-2.26/gas/config/tc-arm.c: In function 'parse_operands': ../../binutils-2.26/gas/config/tc-arm.c:1952:7: error: 'firsttype.index' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] if ((a->defined & NTA_HASINDEX) != 0 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ && (a->index != b->index)) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../../binutils-2.26/gas/config/tc-arm.c:1983:27: note: 'firsttype.index' was declared here struct neon_typed_alias firsttype; ^~~~~~~~~ cc1: all warnings being treated as errors ... for full logs please see http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3359797 http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2215432 Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cross-binutils-2.26-6.fc24 cross-binutils-2.26-7.fc25