Bug 1333753

Summary: [RFE] Check provisioning template if locked or not via either API or hammer CLI
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Kamudini Gazdikova <kshirsal>
Component: HammerAssignee: Marek Hulan <mhulan>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.1.8CC: bbuckingham, mhulan, stbenjam, sthirugn
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/14943
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-11 18:12:24 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kamudini Gazdikova 2016-05-06 10:16:23 UTC
Description of problem:
Check  provisioning template if locked or not via either API or hammer CLI


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Red Hat Satellite v.6.1.8


Issue: 

Request to add feature for hammer command line to check whether a provision template is locked or not.

Currently hammer template does not print if the template is locked or not.

 hammer template info --id 99
Id:                99
Name:              Boot disk iPXE - generic host
Type:              Bootdisk
Operating systems: 

Locations:         
    Default Location
Organizations:     
    Default Organization
    tesorg2
    test-org

Comment 1 Marek Hulan 2016-05-06 10:22:21 UTC
It's already possible to see via API but Hammer is missing the output definition for info command.

Comment 2 Marek Hulan 2016-05-06 10:23:01 UTC
Created redmine issue http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/14943 from this bug

Comment 3 Bryan Kearney 2016-05-06 14:19:27 UTC
Moving to POST since upstream bug http://projects.theforeman.org/issues/14943 has been closed

Comment 4 Stephen Benjamin 2016-05-11 18:12:24 UTC
1328976 is already 3-ACK'd

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1328976 ***