Bug 1334513

Summary: [abrt] atril: ev_web_view_disconnect_handlers(): atril killed by SIGSEGV
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Alexander Heike <alexander.heike>
Component: atrilAssignee: Wolfgang Ulbrich <fedora>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 22CC: fedora
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: https://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/reports/bthash/01ca52af32c512084a47c3a2e854e42bd6cfccac
Whiteboard: abrt_hash:e6857ac4bb140f359327fc25ab4e96fcd5ed09a5;
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-09 20:27:27 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
File: backtrace
none
File: cgroup
none
File: core_backtrace
none
File: dso_list
none
File: environ
none
File: limits
none
File: maps
none
File: mountinfo
none
File: namespaces
none
File: open_fds
none
File: proc_pid_status
none
File: var_log_messages none

Description Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:22 UTC 
Description of problem:
Accidentially re-opened a document, that was already open (by double-clicking it).
I can currently reproduce this in this current session.

Version-Release number of selected component:
atril-1.12.2-2.fc22

Additional info:
reporter:       libreport-2.6.4
backtrace_rating: 4
cmdline:        atril /home/alexander/Documents/me-td/praktikum/A1_MuTD_SS2016.pdf
crash_function: ev_web_view_disconnect_handlers
executable:     /usr/bin/atril
global_pid:     11351
kernel:         4.4.8-200.fc22.x86_64
runlevel:       N 5
type:           CCpp
uid:            1000

Truncated backtrace:
Thread no. 1 (10 frames)
 #0 ev_web_view_disconnect_handlers at ev-web-view.c:865
 #1 ev_window_set_document at ev-window.c:1599
 #2 ev_window_document_changed_cb at ev-window.c:4859
 #8 g_object_notify_by_spec_internal at gobject.c:1149
 #9 g_object_notify at gobject.c:1197
 #10 ev_document_model_set_document at ev-document-model.c:306
 #11 ev_window_reload_job_cb at ev-window.c:1833
 #12 _g_closure_invoke_va at gclosure.c:831
 #15 emit_finished at ev-jobs.c:193
 #20 gtk_main at gtkmain.c:1268

Potential duplicate: bug 1333811
Comment 1 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:28 UTC 
Created attachment 1155452 [details]
File: backtrace
Comment 2 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:29 UTC 
Created attachment 1155453 [details]
File: cgroup
Comment 3 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:30 UTC 
Created attachment 1155454 [details]
File: core_backtrace
Comment 4 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:32 UTC 
Created attachment 1155455 [details]
File: dso_list
Comment 5 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:34 UTC 
Created attachment 1155456 [details]
File: environ
Comment 6 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:35 UTC 
Created attachment 1155457 [details]
File: limits
Comment 7 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:37 UTC 
Created attachment 1155458 [details]
File: maps
Comment 8 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:39 UTC 
Created attachment 1155459 [details]
File: mountinfo
Comment 9 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:40 UTC 
Created attachment 1155460 [details]
File: namespaces
Comment 10 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:42 UTC 
Created attachment 1155461 [details]
File: open_fds
Comment 11 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:43 UTC 
Created attachment 1155462 [details]
File: proc_pid_status
Comment 12 Alexander Heike 2016-05-09 19:53:44 UTC 
Created attachment 1155463 [details]
File: var_log_messages
Comment 13 Wolfgang Ulbrich 2016-05-09 20:24:12 UTC 
The upstream commit to fix previous bugreports causes a regression,
see https://github.com/mate-desktop/atril/issues/198
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333811
I will revert the culprit patch, but this will introduce previous issues with firefox again.
Main prob is that epub code is involved if using pdfs.
Btw. it looks like that webkit code is in general a bit buggy.
Sorry for that fallout, we will work at upstream to fix previous issues without introducing a regression again.
Comment 14 Wolfgang Ulbrich 2016-05-09 20:27:27 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1333811 ***