Bug 1335361
Summary: | Fix brick information output in heal info's xml output | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Ravishankar N <ravishankar> |
Component: | replicate | Assignee: | Ravishankar N <ravishankar> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | mainline | CC: | bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-05-12 05:06:25 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Ravishankar N
2016-05-12 04:48:51 UTC
[10:23] <itisravi> RameshN: Is it okay that hostUUID is null when brick is down? [10:24] <RameshN> I am ignoring the brick which is not up [10:24] <itisravi> RameshN: because we can get that only when brick is down. [10:24] <itisravi> RameshN: sorry I mean brick is up. [10:24] <RameshN> why not brick name [10:24] <RameshN> ok [10:25] <itisravi> brick name we have locally. [10:25] <itisravi> so we can print. [10:26] <RameshN> ok. I need hostUuid to map. But anyway its not an issue, we have the brick list with hostuuid, and we check heal status for each brick, we can ignore if the brick is not up. Anyway we won't be able to get the entries [10:29] <itisravi> RameshN: umm so you want the brick name to be printed or not? [10:30] <itisravi> RameshN: I just raised a bug :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335361 [10:30] <itisravi> wondering If I need to close it then. [10:31] <RameshN> We can't use just brick name. If possible we need both hostUuid and brick name, otherwise leave it. We can work with workaround :-) [10:35] <itisravi> RameshN: ok, closing it then. [10:35] <RameshN> ok Closing it based on comments above. |