Bug 1336844
| Summary: | Can not add rbac group with large database | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Alex Krzos <akrzos> | ||||||||||
| Component: | UI - OPS | Assignee: | Martin Hradil <mhradil> | ||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Alex Krzos <akrzos> | ||||||||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||||||||
| Version: | 5.4.0 | CC: | dajohnso, hkataria, jhardy, mpovolny, obarenbo | ||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | GA | ||||||||||||
| Target Release: | 5.6.0 | ||||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | rbac | ||||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-08-01 18:25:30 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
|
Description
Alex Krzos
2016-05-17 14:44:03 UTC
Created attachment 1158332 [details]
production.log
Created attachment 1158334 [details]
evm.log on 5.4.5.0 grepped on ui worker pid
Created attachment 1158369 [details]
Same issue on 5.5.4.0 - evm.log
Created attachment 1158370 [details]
Same issue on 5.5.4.0 - production.log
I attached logs from a 5.5.4.0 appliance as well exhibiting the behavior described.
In summary I have two database dumps, and two different appliance versions tested and only one combination is not affected by this setup(5.4.5.0 w/ 13000VMs):
13000VMs DB 23000VMs DB
5.4.5.0 No Yes
5.5.4.0 Yes Yes
I am doubtful this issues has anything to dow ith vm counts, and more than likely user/group counts in the database but FWIW
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1360911 *** |