Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 1336902

Summary: chpasswd allows for SELinux sandbox breakout in certain situations
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: exm6939
Component: shadow-utilsAssignee: Tomas Mraz <tmraz>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Stefan Kremen <skremen>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.2CC: lvrabec, mgrepl, mmalik, pkis, plautrba, pvrabec, ssekidde, tmraz
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: shadow-utils-4.1.5.1-21.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-04 03:41:42 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description exm6939 2016-05-17 18:24:59 UTC
Description of problem:
chpasswd is not SELinux aware, but is granted a default policy as if it was. Therefore root accounts with SELinux restrictions can bypass these restrictions.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
redhat-release-server-7.2-9.el7.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create administrative account e.g. superadmin, add to wheel group
2. Add superadmin to staff_u or root selinux group: semanage -a -s root -r s0-s0:c0.c1023 superadmin
3. Restrict root account to user_u user context: semanage -m -s user_u -r s0 root
4. As "user_u" root account, change superadmin's password: echo "superadmin:owned" | chpasswd

Actual results:
Password of superadmin is changed to owned. This is unexpected since user_u should not be able to change the password of someone with a user context of root.

Expected results:
Access denied since it is the user_u context.

Additional info:
7.1 does not have this issue since the chpasswd binary is labeled as bin_t. That is only a temporary fix, the actual fix being making chpasswd SELinux aware/supported (upstream issue: https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/issues/22).

Comment 2 Tomas Mraz 2016-05-26 09:07:18 UTC
This change should be reverted in selinux-policy for now. Adding selinux support to chpasswd would have to be done upstream first.

Comment 4 Milos Malik 2016-05-26 10:12:23 UTC
RHEL-7.1
========
# matchpathcon `which chpasswd `
/usr/sbin/chpasswd	system_u:object_r:bin_t:s0
#

RHEL-7.2
========
# matchpathcon `which chpasswd `
/usr/sbin/chpasswd	system_u:object_r:passwd_exec_t:s0
#

Comment 5 Lukas Vrabec 2016-05-26 12:30:37 UTC
Hi Tomas, 

This change is related to this bz:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243458

We should find other way how to fix it.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-04 03:41:42 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2322.html