Bug 1337716

Summary:	List of Cloud Objects shows all objects after going through one Cloud Store
Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine	Reporter:	Matouš Mojžíš <mmojzis>
Component:	UI - OPS	Assignee:	Sam Lucidi <slucidi>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Matouš Mojžíš <mmojzis>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.6.0	CC:	gblomqui, hkataria, jhardy, mpovolny, obarenbo, simaishi
Target Milestone:	GA
Target Release:	5.6.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	ui openstack
Fixed In Version:	5.6.0.8	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2016-06-29 16:04:40 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Matouš Mojžíš 2016-05-19 22:13:17 UTC

Description of problem:
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/issues/8693
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/8773

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.6.0.7-beta2.6.20160516171555_b1be31f 

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Upload at least two object stores with one object
2. Add that openstack cloud provider to cfme
3. Go to Compute -> Cloud -> Object stores -> Test object store -> Cloud objects 

Actual results:
Url is /cloud_object_store_object/show_list and shows all Cloud objects

Expected results:
Url should identify object store and it shouldn't list all objects

Additional info:

Comment 3 Matouš Mojžíš 2016-05-27 09:43:35 UTC

Verified in 5.6.0.8-rc1.20160524155303_f2a5a50.
It lists cloud object store own objects now and shows ids in url.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2016-06-29 16:04:40 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1348