Bug 1338083

Summary: Update UEFI whitelist for official fedora packages
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Cole Robinson <crobinso>
Component: libguestfsAssignee: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 24CC: mbooth, ptoscano, rjones, virt-maint
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-05-23 09:13:21 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Cole Robinson 2016-05-21 14:46:32 UTC
Fedora has native ovmf and aavmf packages now (mostly, still working out the kinks for aavmf on x86, see bug 1338027), but I think the libguestfs whitelist will need to be extended

$ rpm -ql edk2-ovmf
/usr/share/doc/edk2-ovmf
/usr/share/doc/edk2-ovmf/README
/usr/share/edk2
/usr/share/edk2/ovmf
/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/EnrollDefaultKeys.efi
/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_CODE.fd
/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_CODE.secboot.fd
/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_VARS.fd
/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/Shell.efi
/usr/share/edk2/ovmf/UefiShell.iso
/usr/share/licenses/edk2-ovmf
/usr/share/licenses/edk2-ovmf/LICENSE.openssl
/usr/share/licenses/edk2-ovmf/License.txt

$ rpm -ql edk2-aarch64
/usr/share/edk2
/usr/share/edk2/aarch64
/usr/share/edk2/aarch64/QEMU_EFI-pflash.raw
/usr/share/edk2/aarch64/QEMU_EFI.fd
/usr/share/edk2/aarch64/vars-template-pflash.raw
/usr/share/licenses/edk2-aarch64
/usr/share/licenses/edk2-aarch64/License.txt

Comment 1 Richard W.M. Jones 2016-05-22 20:34:44 UTC
Looks like from:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=767546
that we're not building 32 bit x86 (ia32) OVMF binaries?  It doesn't
especially matter, but I'll note that Gerd's repo did contain them.

Thanks for the bug report anyway, I have posted this patch upstream:

https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2016-May/thread.html#00173

Comment 2 Richard W.M. Jones 2016-05-23 09:13:21 UTC
Upstream in libguestfs >= 1.33.30.