Bug 1338593

Summary:	clean posix locks based on client-id as part of server_connection_cleanup
Product:	[Community] GlusterFS	Reporter:	Susant Kumar Palai <spalai>
Component:	locks	Assignee:	Susant Kumar Palai <spalai>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	mainline	CC:	atumball, bugs, sarumuga
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:
Clones:	1384388 (view as bug list)		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-05-11 02:10:27 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1384388

Description Susant Kumar Palai 2016-05-23 05:37:38 UTC

Description of problem:
  Currently posix locks are removed based on the fd number in case of a server disconnect event. Post lock migration, the locks will not have any fd association on destination. Hence, posix locks need to be removed based on client-id.

Comment 1 Vijay Bellur 2016-05-23 06:20:15 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-id for cleanup) posted (#1) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 2 Vijay Bellur 2016-06-13 10:40:30 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-uuid) posted (#2) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 3 Vijay Bellur 2016-08-01 05:47:32 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-uuid) posted (#3) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 4 Worker Ant 2016-09-14 07:40:58 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-uuid) posted (#4) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 5 Worker Ant 2016-09-20 08:39:28 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-uuid) posted (#5) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 6 Worker Ant 2016-09-20 12:56:34 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-uuid) posted (#6) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 7 Worker Ant 2016-09-27 13:44:36 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-uuid) posted (#7) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 8 Worker Ant 2016-09-27 13:49:40 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-uuid) posted (#8) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 9 Worker Ant 2016-09-28 03:07:50 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-uuid) posted (#9) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 10 Worker Ant 2016-10-03 10:27:08 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-uuid) posted (#10) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 11 Worker Ant 2016-10-03 10:53:55 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-uuid) posted (#11) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 12 Worker Ant 2016-10-03 11:03:51 UTC

REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/14492 (posix/locks: associate posix locks with client-uuid) posted (#12) for review on master by Susant Palai (spalai)

Comment 13 Amar Tumballi 2019-05-11 02:10:27 UTC

Any progress done?

Considering we had not issues due to this in long time, marking it as DEFERRED. Will revisit when we get time.