Bug 1338673
Summary: | glibc: GCC 6 enablement for struct sockaddr_storage [el6] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Florian Weimer <fweimer> |
Component: | glibc | Assignee: | DJ Delorie <dj> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Sergey Kolosov <skolosov> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | Mark Flitter <mflitter> |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.9 | CC: | ashankar, codonell, dj, fweimer, jridky, kdudka, mcermak, mflitter, mnewsome, pfrankli, skolosov |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Patch, Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | glibc-2.12-1.207.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
Resolution for gcc compatibility issue with "sockaddr_in"
The default RHEL 6 compiler has rules about how to copy "struct sockaddr_in" that are substantially different to those used by later versions of gcc (E.g. the tools provided with Red Hat Developer Toolset). This caused corrupted sockaddr_in overlays when using newer compilers.
This update changes the way the "unused" portions of the sockaddr_in structure are defined. Now, newer versions of gcc will copy them correctly.
Note that -fno-strict-aliasing is still required for compiling such sources.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | 1337291 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2017-03-21 10:36:40 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1337291, 1338672 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1361283 |
Description
Florian Weimer
2016-05-23 08:50:27 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0680.html |