Bug 1340542
| Summary: | Need backported fix for install_exec_t (or rpm_exec_t) for rpm-ostreed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Colin Walters <walters> |
| Component: | selinux-policy | Assignee: | Lukas Vrabec <lvrabec> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Milos Malik <mmalik> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | urgent | ||
| Version: | 7.2 | CC: | lvrabec, mgrepl, mmalik, plautrba, pvrabec, ssekidde |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | selinux-policy-3.13.1-77.el7 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-11-04 02:29:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Colin Walters
2016-05-27 19:14:30 UTC
Related to this...as I discussed in the PR, is there a reason we're not using rpm_t as PackageKit already does? (In reply to Colin Walters from comment #1) > Related to this...as I discussed in the PR, is there a reason we're not > using rpm_t as PackageKit already does? Can someone reply to this aspect please? And related to this, can the policy be changed to set this *both* on /usr/bin/rpm-ostree and /usr/libexec/rpm-ostreed (which may not exist after the above linked PR lands) Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2283.html |