Bug 1340902
| Summary: | There is no limit on container images concurrent SSAs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Mooli Tayer <mtayer> |
| Component: | SmartState Analysis | Assignee: | Mooli Tayer <mtayer> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Einat Pacifici <epacific> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 5.6.0 | CC: | cpelland, dron, epacific, fsimonce, jhardy, mfeifer, obarenbo, simaishi |
| Target Milestone: | GA | Flags: | epacific:
automate_bug+
|
| Target Release: | 5.6.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | container | ||
| Fixed In Version: | 5.6.0.9 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-06-29 16:06:52 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Mooli Tayer
2016-05-30 15:42:52 UTC
Fix suggested upstream: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/8760 To verify this change on qe, two things must be verified: 1. The new limit on parallel execution of container image scans works as expected. At most 3 scans run together (run all and check out "All vm and container analysis tasks"). The number can be changed in the configuration through container_scanning -> concurrent_per_ems 2. The scanning and concurrency of vms was not effected. Verified. Steps to verify: Modified configuration in: container_scanning -> concurrent_per_ems (default was =3, changed it to =2) Added 4 new apps in Openshift (each app used a new image) Viewed Settings --> Tasks. Two new images were scanned at any one time. Once scan was completed, two new images were scanned. Hi Einat, did you test vm scanning concurrency as well? (See my previous comment) that would probably reuire some help Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016:1348 |