Bug 1341740

Summary: inconsistency on the monitoring button between pages
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Dafna Ron <dron>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: zakiva
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Gilad Shefer <gshefer>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.6.0CC: cpelland, epacific, fsimonce, hkataria, jhardy, mpovolny, mtayer, obarenbo, simaishi, zakiva
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: TestOnly, ZStream
Target Release: 5.7.0   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: container
Fixed In Version: 5.7.0.0 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1342222 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-01-11 19:54:56 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1342222    
Attachments:
Description Flags
screenshots none

Description Dafna Ron 2016-06-01 16:16:40 UTC
Created attachment 1163742 [details]
screenshots

Description of problem:

When you expend the monitoring button, in some pages the timeline is first and Utilisation is second and in other pages it's reversed. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

cfme-5.6.0.8-rc1.1.el7cf.x86_64

How reproducible:

100% 

Steps to Reproduce:
1. navigate to compute -> container -> provider -> select provider -> monitoring  
2. navigate to compute -> container -> containers -> select container -> monitoring
3.

Actual results:

in providers the utilization appears before the timeline and in containers the timeline appears before the utilization. 

Expected results:

we should have consistency on all pages 

Additional info: screenshots

I checked all the pages and the utilization appears first in both providers and in nodes 


This might be a fast easy fix so putting 5.6z flag

Comment 2 zakiva 2016-06-08 11:59:57 UTC
Bug fix: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/9142

Comment 3 Federico Simoncelli 2016-07-12 09:13:03 UTC
Shouldn't this be in POST?