Bug 1342006
Summary: | upgrade stomppy to version 4.* | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Cristovao Cordeiro <cristovao.cordeiro> |
Component: | stomppy | Assignee: | Steve Traylen <steve.traylen> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel7 | CC: | steve.traylen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-06-03 13:00:20 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Cristovao Cordeiro
2016-06-02 09:11:48 UTC
Your example demonstrates it is not forward compatible. But indeed https://github.com/jasonrbriggs/stomp.py/blob/master/CHANGELOG#L202 version 4.0 states it's not backwards compatible so as a simple upgrade within EPEL this is not possible unless there is a super good reason. Do you actually need stomp version 1.2 which is the only new feature, can you not just use the version 3 construct? If still needed can looking at doing a new stomppy4 package. I can work around then for this use case. But nevertheless the upgrade/new package should be at some point right? Not within the life time of RHEL7, RHEL8 will have the latest. Unless a good reason or the existing one is so broken that it's easier to blast it away and start again but we are not in that category here. Steve. |