Bug 134233

Summary: An error has occurred while processing your request. Updating Computer
Product: Red Hat Network Reporter: Kevin <ibtrukn>
Component: RHN/BackendAssignee: Adrian Likins <alikins>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List <satellite-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: RHN StableCC: nick.northcote, shillman
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-11 17:31:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Kevin 2004-09-30 14:17:37 UTC
Description of problem:
Trying to update my box by either
up2date and/or manually updating net-snmp

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Linux version 2.4.21-20.EL (bhcompile@tweety.build.redhat.com) (gcc
version 3.2.3 20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-42)) #1 Wed Aug 18
20:58:25 EDT 2004

How reproducible:
Everytime I try to update either through up2date or manually

Steps to Reproduce:
Actual results:
This through up2date::
There was a fatal error communicating with the server.  The message was:
File Not Found: net-snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.6.src.rpm

Error Message:
Invalid RPM package net-snmp-5.0.9-2.30E.6.src.rpm requested
Error Class Code: 17
Error Class Info: File not found.
An error has occurred while processing your request. If this problem
persists please enter a bug report at bugzilla.redhat.com.
If you choose to submit the bug report, please be sure to include
details of what you were trying to do when this error occurred and
details on how to reproduce this problem.

Manually ftping files off the server and installing them I get
net-snmp is need by this such and such package
it calls for these and I have them

Expected results:
to update my machine

Additional info:

Comment 1 Suzanne Hillman 2005-04-05 19:37:20 UTC
Is this still a problem?

Comment 2 James Bowes 2008-02-11 17:31:51 UTC
Closing due to inactivity

Comment 3 James Bowes 2008-02-11 17:33:17 UTC
*** Bug 136458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***