Bug 1342596
Summary: | [Docs] [Nova] Major change in functionality between Nova API v2.0 and v2.1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Irina Petrova <ipetrova> | |
Component: | documentation | Assignee: | Martin Lopes <mlopes> | |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Radek Bíba <rbiba> | |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | high | |||
Version: | 8.0 (Liberty) | CC: | adahms, ipetrova, mlopes, pcaruana, srevivo | |
Target Milestone: | async | Keywords: | Documentation, ZStream | |
Target Release: | 8.0 (Liberty) | |||
Hardware: | All | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 1342601 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-07-11 07:55:55 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 1342601 |
Description
Irina Petrova
2016-06-03 15:55:19 UTC
Assigning to Martin for review. Republished guides with note in Appendix A: "The following functionality is limited to Nova API v2.0, and currently does not apply to Nova API v2.1" Links: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-enterprise-linux-openstack-platform/7/configuration-reference/appendix-a-the-policyjson-file https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-openstack-platform/8/configuration-reference/appendix-a-the-policyjson-file For docs QE: Added this note: ---- <note><para>The following functionality is limited to Nova API v2.0, and currently does <emphasis>not</emphasis> apply to Nova API v2.1</para></note> ---- To these sections: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-enterprise-linux-openstack-platform/7/configuration-reference/appendix-a-the-policyjson-file https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-openstack-platform/8/configuration-reference/appendix-a-the-policyjson-file I would use a full stop at the end of the sentence. What do you think? I initially thought it would make sense to omit the full stop to avoid any ambiguity about version numbers, but I think the reader would be able to discern this. Added full stop to gitlab draft. Thanks, Martin. I believe it'll be clear that the full stop marks the end of the sentence and isn't part of the version string. AFAIK, version strings generally don't end with full stops, anyway. I don't see the updates at the Portal, but I see them in git. Presumably, you're going to republish the docs shortly. Moving to VERIFIED. This content is now live on the Customer Portal. Closing. |