Bug 1343156
| Summary: | Drop gcj dependency | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Viktor Ashirov <vashirov> |
| Component: | ldapjdk | Assignee: | Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Asha Akkiangady <aakkiang> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 6.8 | CC: | enewland, jorton, mharmsen, mizdebsk, ssidhaye |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | 6.9 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ldapjdk-4.18-8.el6 | Doc Type: | No Doc Update |
| Doc Text: |
undefined
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-03-21 09:08:23 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1355984 | ||
|
Description
Viktor Ashirov
2016-06-06 16:02:16 UTC
I tried installing ldapjdk-4.18-7.el6 This is what I see, I think it is still pulling the gcj dependency. [root@bkr-hv01-guest06 ~]# rpm -ivh ldapjdk-4.18-7.el6.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: jaas is needed by ldapjdk-0:4.18-7.el6.x86_64 jndi is needed by ldapjdk-0:4.18-7.el6.x86_64 jpackage-utils >= 0:1.5 is needed by ldapjdk-0:4.18-7.el6.x86_64 jss is needed by ldapjdk-0:4.18-7.el6.x86_64 jsse is needed by ldapjdk-0:4.18-7.el6.x86_64 libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit) is needed by ldapjdk-0:4.18-7.el6.x86_64 [root@bkr-hv01-guest06 ~]# Hence marking this assigned. The fix was corrected. # rpm -q ldapjdk libgcj ldapjdk-4.18-8.el6.x86_64 package libgcj is not installed I do not see the libgcj being pulled now when I install ldapjdk. Hence marking this bug as verified. Here is the install output: [root@auto-hv-02-guest06 ~]# yum install ldapjdk-4.18-8.el6.x86_64.rpm Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================================================================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================================================================================================================= Installing: ldapjdk x86_64 4.18-8.el6 /ldapjdk-4.18-8.el6.x86_64 2.4 M Installing for dependencies: copy-jdk-configs noarch 1.2-1.el7 beaker-Server 14 k java-1.8.0-openjdk x86_64 1:1.8.0.111-2.b15.el7_3 beaker-Server 231 k java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless x86_64 1:1.8.0.111-2.b15.el7_3 beaker-Server 31 M javapackages-tools noarch 3.4.1-11.el7 beaker-Server 73 k jss x86_64 4.2.6-42.el7 beaker-Server 706 k lksctp-tools x86_64 1.0.17-2.el7 beaker-Server 88 k python-javapackages noarch 3.4.1-11.el7 beaker-Server 31 k ttmkfdir x86_64 3.0.9-42.el7 beaker-Server 48 k tzdata-java noarch 2016j-1.el7 beaker-Server 182 k xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 noarch 7.5-9.el7 beaker-Server 521 k Transaction Summary ============================================================================================================================================================================= Installed: ldapjdk.x86_64 0:4.18-8.el6 Dependency Installed: copy-jdk-configs.noarch 0:1.2-1.el7 java-1.8.0-openjdk.x86_64 1:1.8.0.111-2.b15.el7_3 java-1.8.0-openjdk-headless.x86_64 1:1.8.0.111-2.b15.el7_3 javapackages-tools.noarch 0:3.4.1-11.el7 jss.x86_64 0:4.2.6-42.el7 lksctp-tools.x86_64 0:1.0.17-2.el7 python-javapackages.noarch 0:3.4.1-11.el7 ttmkfdir.x86_64 0:3.0.9-42.el7 tzdata-java.noarch 0:2016j-1.el7 xorg-x11-fonts-Type1.noarch 0:7.5-9.el7 Complete! [root@auto-hv-02-guest06 ~]# rpm -q ldapjdk libgcj ldapjdk-4.18-8.el6.x86_64 package libgcj is not installed Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-0579.html |