Bug 1343891

Summary: Disable spapr-rng device in downstream qemu 2.6
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 Reporter: Thomas Huth <thuth>
Component: qemu-kvm-rhevAssignee: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 7.3CC: jen, knoel, lvivier, michen, qzhang, virt-maint, xuhan, zhengtli
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: ppc64le   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: qemu-kvm-rhev-2.6.0-6.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-11-07 21:15:53 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1289417    
Bug Blocks: 1333282    

Description Thomas Huth 2016-06-08 09:02:51 UTC
In BZ 1337557 we came to the conclusion that we won't support the spapr-rng device in qemu-kvm-rhev. Since the device is currently available by default due to the rebase to QEMU 2.6.0, we should now make sure that it gets disabled in the downstream version again.

Comment 1 Miroslav Rezanina 2016-06-15 13:08:52 UTC
Fix included in qemu-kvm-rhev-2.6.0-6.el7

Comment 3 mazhang 2016-06-21 02:34:29 UTC
Test this bug on qemu-kvm-rhev-2.6.0-7.el7.ppc64le.

# /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -device ? 2>&1 |grep rng
name "virtio-rng-device", bus virtio-bus
name "virtio-rng-pci", bus PCI, alias "virtio-rng"
# /usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -device spapr-rng,id=rng0
qemu-kvm: -device spapr-rng,id=rng0: 'spapr-rng' is not a valid device model name

spapr-rng device has been disabled.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2016-11-07 21:15:53 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2673.html