Bug 1344778

Summary: Confusing organization of repositories under Content->Red Hat Repositories.
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Rich Jerrido <rjerrido>
Component: WebUIAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
WebUI sub component: Katello QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE Docs Contact:
Severity: low    
Priority: unspecified CC: bbuckingham
Version: 6.2.0Keywords: Triaged
Target Milestone: Unspecified   
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-16 15:34:54 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rich Jerrido 2016-06-10 19:05:22 UTC 
Description of problem:

As a user, many Red Hat repositories (in Content->Red Hat Repositories) are listed in the Satellite UI under the 'Other' tab, with (seemingly) no logic as to why. This leads to user confusion as repositories which contain RPMs (such as Red Hat Software Collections) are listed under the 'Other' tab, when they are in fact, RPMs repositories. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ALL

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Satellite with a manifest that provides access to RHSCL
2. Visit the Content->Red Hat Repositories -> Other tab. 

Actual results:

RHSCL repos are on the Other tab. (Example:https://mmccune.fedorapeople.org/scratch/scl-repos.png)


Expected results:

RHSCL repos which contain RPMs are listed under the 'RPMs' tab. 

Additional info:

This issue is not solely limited to the RHSCL repo. It is just one of many which exhibit this behavior.
Comment 2 Brad Buckingham 2016-06-16 15:34:54 UTC 
We have a similar issue raised in bug 1244286; therefore, going to close this one since it is newer.  I will add a note to this bug to refer to this one as well when implementing the solution.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1244286 ***