Bug 1348388
| Summary: | Should remove ";vdsmdummy;" in cockpit after register to RHEVM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [oVirt] vdsm | Reporter: | wanghui <huiwa> |
| Component: | Core | Assignee: | Dan Kenigsberg <danken> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Meni Yakove <myakove> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 4.18.10 | CC: | bugs, cshao, danken, fdeutsch, gklein, huzhao, leiwang, rbarry, weiwang, yaniwang, ycui, ykaul |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | sbonazzo:
ovirt-4.1-
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-08-29 12:50:33 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | Network | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
wanghui
2016-06-21 04:56:52 UTC
Dan, can vdsm learn to not create this bridge? Vdsm needs this VM for implementing non-wired vNICs. Theoretically, we can create it much later (e.g. before starting a VM), but it won't be fun. What's the big problem in reporting oVirt bridges as Cockpit interfaces? (In reply to Dan Kenigsberg from comment #2) > Vdsm needs this VM for implementing non-wired vNICs. Theoretically, we can > create it much later (e.g. before starting a VM), but it won't be fun. > > What's the big problem in reporting oVirt bridges as Cockpit interfaces? If you report this as cockpit interface, it means it can be managed or modified which should not. So it should be better not to report this bridge at all. QE suggest to include this fix in RHV 4.0 GA. Cockpit is showing all network devices. if it should not be shown, then it must not be created. Thus moving to vdsm which can consider to remove this device. We cannot just remove it, it's required for disconnected vNICs. Fabian, do you think that cockpit could add a blacklist of devices not to show in its UI? Hm, there is actually no cockpit specific configuration, so it would be an NM blacklist. But to me that does not look like the right direction. IMO if the bridge is needed, then we should expose it. |