Bug 1349664

Summary: Incorrect pattern in convert-to-edition.lua clear_presets() results in erroneous removal of non-product presets
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Adam Williamson <awilliam>
Component: fedora-releaseAssignee: Dennis Gilmore <dennis>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: dennis, jdisnard, kevin, pbrobinson, rdieter, sgallagh, zbyszek
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: fedora-release-24-2 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-06-26 20:54:35 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1337546    
Attachments:
Description Flags
patch to fix the bug none

Description Adam Williamson 2016-06-23 22:59:03 UTC
The convert-to-edition.lua script has this function, which is called by convert_to_edition, which is called by install_edition:

-- Remove preset files for other editions
-- This should never be necessary, but it's best to be safe
local function clear_presets()
  local path = "/usr/lib/systemd/system-preset"
  for file in posix.files(path) do
    if file:match("^80-.*%.preset$") then
      os.remove(path .. "/" .. file)
    end
  end
end

It's obviously intended to do, basically, `rm -f /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/80-*.preset` . The problem is, the pattern's wrong.

What it actually does is more like `rm -f /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/8*.preset`. This is because '-' is a special character in lua patterns. See http://lua-users.org/wiki/PatternsTutorial:

- Match the previous character (or class) zero or more times, as few times as possible.

so the '-' effectively negates the 0 character that precedes it. The pattern will match 80-foo.preset , but it will also match 85-foo.preset , or 8aaaaa.preset .

The %post scriptlets for all fedora-release subpackages call install_edition, and there's a fedora-release %posttrans scriptlet which also calls install_edition. The upshot is that 8*.preset will be wiped at some point during *any* Fedora 24+ install - if any 'edition' is installed, they'll be wiped during the %post of that package install; if you do a non-edition install (e.g. a minimal install), they'll be wiped in %posttrans.

Notably, this affects /usr/lib/systemd/system-preset/85-display-manager.preset , whose job is to ensure that display managers are enabled by default.

It happens (fortunately...I guess?) that in a network install of Workstation, for e.g., gdm is installed before fedora-release-workstation - so when gdm's %post runs, 85-display-manager.preset is present, and gdm gets enabled (gdm's %post calls `systemctl --no-reload preset gdm.service`). And in an install of any other graphical environment, no 'edition' package will be installed, so the preset file will only be wiped in %posttrans and again the display manager will be enabled properly.

But if you install without a graphical environment, then install one and do `systemctl set-default graphical.target` then reboot, you don't get a graphical boot - because the display manager will not be enabled.

I noticed this because it affects the openQA upgrade test disk images: we build those by (effectively) doing a minimal install and then installing the desktop package group and enabling graphical.target , but I still wasn't getting a graphical boot after doing that, whereas it worked just fine on F23. Turns out, this is the cause.

The fix for this is trivial - we just have to escape the '-' with a '%'. I'm attaching a patch.

Comment 1 Adam Williamson 2016-06-23 23:04:15 UTC
Created attachment 1171748 [details]
patch to fix the bug

should be applied to both Rawhide and F24, and an update shipped for F24.

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2016-06-24 01:28:36 UTC
fedora-release-24-2 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0b6e9310b2

Comment 3 Stephen Gallagher 2016-06-24 12:26:01 UTC
Adam, thanks for the detailed investigation, explanation and patch!

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2016-06-25 00:31:44 UTC
fedora-release-24-2 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0b6e9310b2

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2016-06-26 20:54:28 UTC
fedora-release-24-2 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.