Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Opening a pipe to a command no longer functional|
|Product:||[Retired] Red Hat Linux||Reporter:||Kenneth Brunsen <kenbo>|
|Component:||gdb||Assignee:||Trond Eivind Glomsrxd <teg>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2000-08-11 13:04:25 EDT||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
Description Kenneth Brunsen 2000-07-05 10:00:29 EDT
This appears to be specific to RH 6.2, as I was able to take the perl-5.00503-10 RPM from RH 6.2 and apply it to an RH 6.1 system and the bug does not show up. On RH 6.2, opening a pipe to a command is not functioning correctly such that orders are not sent to the command and the handle is not in blocking mode. For example <script stuff> open(DEBUG_HANDLE, "|gdb $name $PID"); print DEBUG_HANDLE "where\n"; print DEBUG_HANDLE "detach\n"; print DEBUG_HANDLE "quit\n"; close DEBUG_HANDLE; <more script stuff> the code attaching to gdb will no longer work in a perl script, and results in the debugger hanging attached to the process because it has recieved none of the commands while perl reports an error on stdin and continues executing any further perl commands. If more information is needed, I can provide it. This issue has shown up on a customer site and I've been able to duplicate it on a base RH 6.2 system myself. Thank you, Kenneth Brunsen Iris Associates
Comment 1 Nalin Dahyabhai 2000-07-21 14:14:02 EDT
Does this still show up when using another tool to feed commands to gdb?
Comment 2 Kenneth Brunsen 2000-07-25 08:43:58 EDT
Tested standalone gdb with the command "tail -f foo | gdb /bin/ls" and echoing commands into foo showed up and were executed by gdb - so it still appears to be something wrong in perl specifically.
Comment 3 Nalin Dahyabhai 2000-07-27 16:40:08 EDT
Then I suspect this is gdb's behavior rather than perl's. On a Raw Hide system with gdb 5.0, this no longer occurs.
Comment 4 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-07-27 18:48:19 EDT
Does it show up on a 6.2 system with 6.1 gdb?
Comment 5 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-08-04 10:44:08 EDT
Works with the pinstripe beta.
Comment 6 Kenneth Brunsen 2000-08-04 15:00:58 EDT
Can you tell me what the "pinstripe" beta/RAWHIDE is/are and what the planned availability is? At present, we're writing a Release Note for Lotus Domino Release 5.05 which will state that our debug tool "nsd" is unable to run on RH 6.2 due to a bug in perl/gdb on RH6.2 - it'd be nice to also put something in stating a workaround to allow this to work - "nsd" is our primary tool for capturing debug information in the field on problems/crashes with the Lotus Domino product. Thanks! kenbo
Comment 7 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-08-04 15:18:39 EDT
RawHide is a recent cut from out build trees (available from our ftp site and some mirrors), pinstripe is a beta of the upcoming 7.0. Do you have a sample script which demonstrates your behaviour? And did you try the gdb and/or perl from 6.1 on the 6.2 system?
Comment 8 Kenneth Brunsen 2000-08-07 09:41:11 EDT
I just duplicated the bug on my RH 6.1 machine for the first time by upgrading gdb to the gdb shipping with RH 6.2 - so it looks like you are right and it is a gdb issue. I will download the latest gdb from your site and see if it still happens or if it is gone. Thanks. kenbo
Comment 9 Kenneth Brunsen 2000-08-07 13:30:55 EDT
I cannot install the rawhide verion of gdb as it's major number is > 3 and rpm will not handle it; niether can I upgrade rpm to new version with rawhide for the same reason. In order to verify that the gdb from rawhide fixes the issue, I need to be able to install this gdb on a RH 6.1 or RH 6.2 machine - is this possible then? Thanks. kenbo
Comment 10 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-08-08 15:03:13 EDT
Tried rpm 3.0.5 from ftp.rpm.org? (which will be an update RSN - possibly today or tomorrow)
Comment 11 Kenneth Brunsen 2000-08-10 10:24:58 EDT
Ok, I installed rpm 3.0.5.x from ftp.rpm.org and it allows me to install the > 3 packages. However, gdb-5.05 requires libncurses.so.5 and libc.so.6 - both of which basically require me to upgrade my OS to rawhide, which is not acceptable as a "fix" to running Domino/Notes on RH6.2. Any other ideas? If not, we're gonna have to just go with the release note that says that nsd does not work on RH6.2 due to a bug in gdb. Thanks! kenbo
Comment 12 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-08-10 10:31:26 EDT
Try rebuilding the SRPM... we are thinking of doing an errata of this. If you could confirm that it is actually working, that would be one more reason for doing so.
Comment 13 Kenneth Brunsen 2000-08-10 11:39:50 EDT
Rebuilt the gdb-5.0 and it is better, but still not fully working. Now it does not remain attached to the processes, but it is still failing to gain commands. Here is a sample output of a run conclusion: Reading symbols ... Loaded symbols ... 0x40xxxxx in __select () from ... (gdb) Hangup deteced on fd 0 error detected on stdin Detaching from program: /opt/lotus/notes/latest/linux/server, Thread x Since there is no place on here for attachments, I will send you email with a modified version of nsd.pl, called nsd_test.pl which you can use to duplicate the bug by running it with a find command running in the background - I've put some directions in the top of the file on how to run it and how to modify the script to do more. Hopefully this will help in finding a cure. Thanks! kenbo
Comment 14 Daniel Berlin 2000-08-11 13:04:23 EDT
Sorry, this ain't a bug in GDB. The fact that xxgdb, ddd, etc, works fine tells me it's a problem in perl if anywhere, but more to the point, the way you are going about this is wrong. If you want a tty to communicate with gdb, create a tty and do gdb --tty="whatever". Don't try to play games with stdin. If you need something more complex, look at the new MI interface.
Comment 15 Trond Eivind Glomsrxd 2000-08-11 14:52:51 EDT
OK - bug in usage according to one of the GDB develpers (don't use GDB though a pipe). Closing.