Bug 1350889
Summary: | aarch64: hotplug removing drive causes segfault in hmp_drive_del > qdict_get_str > qstring_get_str | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Richard W.M. Jones <rjones> |
Component: | qemu-kvm-rhev | Assignee: | Andrew Jones <drjones> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 7.3 | CC: | drjones, hhuang, huzhan, jcm, knoel, leiwang, linl, ptoscano, sherold, virt-bugs, virt-maint, wshi |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | aarch64 | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | 1221569 | Environment: | |
Last Closed: | 2016-08-02 13:07:30 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Richard W.M. Jones
2016-06-28 15:32:53 UTC
I couldn't reproduce this. First I used test-hot-remove.pl, but with some added print statements creating temp disks... hot adding temp disks... removing temp disks... (this phase took a longish time, 30-40 seconds) adding disks again... using disks... removing disks... SUCCESS... Since that worked, I manually did virsh attach-disk/detach-disk with a rhel7.3 guest, and that worked too. I have latest RHELSA bits installed on both host and guest. kernel-4.5.0-0.48.el7.aarch64 (booting with ACPI) qemu-kvm-rhev-2.6.0-14.el7.aarch64 libguestfs-1.32.6-2.el7.aarch64 (from brewweb, batcave has 1.32.5-5.el7) I cannot reproduce this now either. Probably it was fixed in the updated qemu. At a guess I would say it's this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341531 If you look at the stack trace (attached to that bug) you'll see it's pretty much identical to this one. (In reply to Richard W.M. Jones from comment #4) > At a guess I would say it's this bug: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341531 > If you look at the stack trace (attached to that bug) you'll > see it's pretty much identical to this one. I agree. Thanks for following up on it. I'm satisfied enough with the two traces matching, and the fact that the bug is gone, to let this bug rest without further investigation (i.e. proof that it's fixed) I'm so convinced, let's dup it. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1341531 *** |