Bug 135267

Summary:	Fedora public CVS soon outdated
Product:	Red Hat Web Site	Reporter:	Ralf Corsepius <rc040203>
Component:	Other	Assignee:	Tammy Fox <tammy.c.fox>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	current	CC:	byte, jwboyer, redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	http://fedora.redhat.com/participate
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-12-02 21:24:36 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ralf Corsepius 2004-10-11 15:16:51 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3)
Gecko/20040922

Description of problem:
http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/ says:

Soon

Red Hat will be making available a public CVS repository for Fedora
development, and will (over time) move to maintaining packages in that
public CVS repository. Anyone will be able to view the contents of
that public CVS repository; approved contributors will also be given
commit access to appropriate packages. This is intended to be
available by the release of Fedora Core 2. 


This piece of information obviously is outdated.

Comment 1 Luke Meyer 2004-10-11 15:22:24 UTC

"real soon now"

Comment 2 Robert Scheck 2004-10-23 12:19:32 UTC

Would be nice to see that *really soon* not somewhere in far future, 
where it currently is moved to.

Comment 3 Colin Charles 2004-12-02 17:19:06 UTC

*** Bug 141610 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Colin Charles 2004-12-02 17:23:41 UTC

Okay, we should find a resolve to this, like now. FC-3 is out too, and we
probably should change that, including the schedule (when we decide on it)

colin->tfox: Want me to patch the PHP, or will you handle this? Thanks.

Comment 5 Tammy Fox 2004-12-02 21:24:36 UTC

OK. I've changed it to "real soon now" because that is the best answer
we have right now. It should be live within the hour.