Bug 1353220
| Summary: | Error "undefined method `match' " while attaching cloud volume to an instance | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | John Prause <jprause> | ||||
| Component: | UI - OPS | Assignee: | Sam Lucidi <slucidi> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Ramesh A <rananda> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 5.6.0 | CC: | cpelland, hkataria, jhardy, jprause, mpovolny, obarenbo, rananda, rrasouli | ||||
| Target Milestone: | GA | Keywords: | ZStream | ||||
| Target Release: | 5.6.5 | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | provider:cloud:volume | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | 1339173 | Environment: | |||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-11-08 17:39:27 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | 1339173 | ||||||
| Bug Blocks: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Comment 1
John Prause
2016-07-06 14:47:16 UTC
Verification failed in 5.6.1.0.20160726144018_810a94f. When attaching a volume to an instance, following error is found, "Unable to attach Cloud Volume "My volume-2" to test_inst_pwrctl_AKQMcukr: undefined method `attach_volume' for nil:NilClass" Refer the screenshot "attach-volume-error.jpg" and evm.log file for more details evm.log: [----] E, [2016-08-02T03:09:33.609291 #3109:975c98] ERROR -- : MIQ(cloud_volume_controller-attach_volume): Unable to attach Cloud Volume "My volume-2" to test_inst_pwrctl_AKQMcukr: undefined method `attach_volume' for nil:NilClass Created attachment 1186672 [details]
attach-volume-error.jpg
The original bug is closed, any reason this shouldn't be? |