Bug 135414

Summary: unescaped RPM macro places excessive garbage text into changelog
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Moritz Barsnick <moritz>
Component: nfs-utilsAssignee: Steve Dickson <steved>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-31 16:23:00 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Moritz Barsnick 2004-10-12 11:52:47 EDT
Description of problem:
In the SPEC file, there is an unescaped RPM macro, namely %configure. 
This is unfortunately expanded in the changelog (rpm -qp --changelog 
$file.rpm), and is a bit annoying.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. tail +`fgrep -n %changelog nfs-utils.spec | cut -d: -f1`  nfs-
utils.spec | fgrep %configure
Actual results:
- Build with %configure

Expected results:
- Build with %%configure

Additional info:
Comment 1 Moritz Barsnick 2005-11-01 04:49:59 EST
Oh, it seems the SPEC file has been changed in the meantime. Well, then I agree 
with this closure as "not a bug".  :-)  Thanks.
Comment 2 Moritz Barsnick 2005-11-01 05:01:48 EST
Darn! Damned browser! Who changed the component to 4Suite???

Please excuse the mishap. I'm changing it back to nfs-utils.

So, let me please withdraw my previous comment #1.

I still consider it a bug, as rpm -qp --changelog nfs-utils-1.0.7-19.FC5.src.rpm 

* Mon Nov 18 2002 Stephen C. Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>

- Build with 
  CFLAGS="${CFLAGS:--O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -
fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=n
ocona}" ; export CFLAGS ; 
  CXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS:--O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions 
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtu
ne=nocona}" ; export CXXFLAGS ; 
  FFLAGS="${FFLAGS:--O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -
fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=n
ocona}" ; export FFLAGS ; 
  for i in $(find . -name config.guess -o -name config.sub) ; do 
           [ -f /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/$(basename $i) ] && /bin/rm -f $i && /bin/cp 
-fv /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/$(basename $i) $i ; 
  done ; 
  ./configure --build=x86_64-redhat-linux --host=x86_64-redhat-linux \
        --target=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu \
        --program-prefix= \
        --prefix=/usr \
        --exec-prefix=/usr \
        --bindir=/usr/bin \
        --sbindir=/usr/sbin \
        --sysconfdir=/etc \
        --datadir=/usr/share \
        --includedir=/usr/include \
        --libdir=/usr/lib64 \
        --libexecdir=/usr/libexec \
        --localstatedir=/var \
        --sharedstatedir=/usr/com \
        --mandir=/usr/share/man \
- Add nhfsgraph, nhfsnums and nhfsrun to the files list

* Mon Nov 11 2002 Stephen C. Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>

I don't really thinks that's intended. And as it sometimes changes, it becomes a 
dynamic changelog entry.

The intention must be:
* Mon Nov 18 2002 Stephen C. Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>

- Build with %configure
- Add nhfsgraph, nhfsnums and nhfsrun to the files list

* Mon Nov 11 2002 Stephen C. Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>

I will _not_ take the liberty to reopen this bug. Please, _you_ go ahead and 

Comment 3 Steve Dickson 2005-11-01 06:18:31 EST
Ok I understand what you are saying... sorry for the confusion...
I've made the following changes to the spec file:
diff -r1.71 nfs-utils.spec
< - Build with %configure
> - Build with %%configure
and have check them into our CVS tree and will be
available on the next release of nfs-utils since I would
rather wait to bump the version number.  Unless you need
this fixed released sooner, just let me know...