Bug 1355662
| Summary: | 'qemu-kvm: socket_writev_buffer: Got err=104' when canceling migration | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Qianqian Zhu <qizhu> |
| Component: | qemu-kvm-rhev | Assignee: | Amit Shah <amit.shah> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Qianqian Zhu <qizhu> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 7.3 | CC: | chayang, dgilbert, jinzhao, knoel, qizhu, quintela, virt-maint |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Regression |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-07-29 09:02:05 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Qianqian Zhu
2016-07-12 07:51:47 UTC
Does a second migration succeed after this? If it does, even if this is a regression, it's not a major cause for concern, as: 1) migration was cancelled, and it does get cancelled 2) there's no effect on future migrations The only side-effect of the bug is an unexpected error message, which doesn't cause any harm in actual functionality. However, if further migrations are indeed affected, this should be treated as a blocker. Hi Amit, I have just tested this on qemu-kvm-rhev-2.6.0-16.el7.x86_64. The second migration after cancelling will succeed, it indeed does not harm functionality, it's just showing an error message. But I think it would be better if we could hide this error. Qianqian Thanks for checking. It's really an informative message which is emitted by newer versions of QEMU. These messages help us debug problems. Earlier, such messages were not emitted, but now they are. This doesn't indicate an error, just mentions that an abnormal situation was reached. There's 'err=104' in there, which might suggest it's an error, but that 'err' is just the name of the variable used in code. In summary, nothing has changed functionally, just more logging for easier debugging. I'm closing this as NOTABUG as a result. |