Bug 1360623

Summary:	sosreport should collect detailed dnf history
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Yedidyah Bar David <didi>
Component:	sos	Assignee:	Bryn M. Reeves <bmr>
Status:	CLOSED UPSTREAM	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	bmr, kroberts
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2017-02-23 16:29:58 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1360621

Description Yedidyah Bar David 2016-07-27 07:39:39 UTC

Description of problem:

Sometimes dnf.log isn't enough to understand what happened when debugging an issue based on a sosreport.

dnf allows seeing exactly what happened in each transaction.

We should collect that.

Comment 1 Yedidyah Bar David 2016-07-27 07:43:01 UTC

A patch to do that was pushed to upstream:

https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull/857

Comment 2 Bryn M. Reeves 2016-07-27 09:44:31 UTC

It's considered helpful to QE and others working on the bug to include all the sections of the bugzilla template when filing bugs - although things like how to reproduce, and test may seem obvious when entering the bug it isn't always the case months down the line when people are trying to figure things out close to deadlines.

I've added some comments to the upstream pull request but once that is settled it would be good to add some information here on testing and verifying the new features.

Comment 3 Sandro Bonazzola 2017-02-23 16:29:58 UTC

The problem described has been handled upstream in https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull/857