Bug 1361310

Summary: Service retirement does not work from service details page
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Jeff Warnica <jwarnica>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: Harpreet Kataria <hkataria>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Niyaz Akhtar Ansari <nansari>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.6.0CC: cpelland, dajohnso, hkataria, jhardy, jwarnica, mpovolny, nansari, obarenbo
Target Milestone: GAKeywords: ZStream
Target Release: 5.7.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: service:retirement
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1361690 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-08-05 17:06:19 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1361690    

Description Jeff Warnica 2016-07-28 18:30:13 UTC 
Description of problem:

Service retirement does not work from service details page


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Navigate to a service from /service/explorer in the classic UI
2. Lifecycle->Retire

Actual results:
"No services were selected for retire" displayed


Expected results:
Retirement begins

Additional info:
Retirement does seem to happen if one ore multiple services are selected from the list, and Lifecycle->Retire is triggered.
Comment 3 Jeff Warnica 2016-08-03 14:42:21 UTC 
The same problem happens with instance retirement. I guess this is the same layout and code so it makes sense it also fails.
Comment 4 Harpreet Kataria 2016-08-04 16:31:26 UTC 
Jeff,

Can you provide build information and if possible can i access your appliance to try and recreate the issue. This is not recreatable on upstream locally.

Thanks,
~Harpreet
Comment 5 Harpreet Kataria 2016-08-05 17:06:19 UTC 
This issue has already been fixed with fix for 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344678
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349989

Thanks,
~Harpreet

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1344678 ***