Bug 1361697
| Summary: | Update text in Multi-Site: 8.5: Configuring a Master Zone | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | tserlin |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | John Wilkins <jowilkin> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | shilpa <smanjara> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 2.0 | CC: | hnallurv, jowilkin, kdreyer |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | 2.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-09-30 17:21:09 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Comment 2
shilpa
2016-08-08 08:57:08 UTC
The instructions from the downstream docs have followed the upstream for months. The only material difference I found was with creating a zone and specifying the access key and secret; otherwise they are functionally identical. I added additional reference material too: https://access.qa.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-ceph-storage/2/single/object-gateway-guide-for-red-hat-enterprise-linux#realms (In reply to John Wilkins from comment #3) > The instructions from the downstream docs have followed the upstream for > months. The only material difference I found was with creating a zone and > specifying the access key and secret; otherwise they are functionally > identical. > > I added additional reference material too: > > https://access.qa.redhat.com/documentation/en/red-hat-ceph-storage/2/single/ > object-gateway-guide-for-red-hat-enterprise-linux#realms Section 4.1.9: I don't think there is a 'realm push' option. There is only 'period push'. Looked at the code to double-check to make sure I didn't miss it in the radosgw-admin manpage Fixed. (In reply to John Wilkins from comment #5) > Fixed. Thanks John. Looks good to me. |