Bug 136220

Summary: would be useful for gulm_tool to print resources/services registered with lock_gulmd
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Cluster Suite Reporter: Adam "mantis" Manthei <amanthei>
Component: gfsAssignee: michael conrad tadpol tilstra <mtilstra>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: GFS Bugs <gfs-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-12-03 16:58:46 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 135730, 137219    
Attachments:
Description Flags
implementation for `gulm_tool resourcelist $server` none

Description Adam "mantis" Manthei 2004-10-18 19:18:37 UTC 
Description of problem:
It would be very useful to use gulm_tool to extract what
resources/services are currently registered with lock_gulmd.  This
information is currently available by sending SIGUSR1 to core and
parsing the resulting /tmp/Gulm_Services debugging file.  It would be
helpfull to expose this information to a more user friendly interface
so that users and scripts could utilize this information easier.  With
this information, it would be much easier for scripts to work around
bugs such as bug #135730 and bug #129193


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
GFS-6.0.0-15 and earlier
Comment 1 Adam "mantis" Manthei 2004-10-18 19:23:05 UTC 
Created attachment 105394 [details]
implementation for `gulm_tool resourcelist $server`

The attached patch is a proposal for how to implement this enhancement. 
Included in the patch is a fix for bug #135730 demonstrating how this may be
useful.

I'm a bit confused by the terminology.	I don't know if this is a "resoucelist"
or a "servicelist".  I also don't know if there is a difference between
"resources" and "services", but at least this provides the general idea of what
I had in mind.
Comment 2 michael conrad tadpol tilstra 2004-10-18 20:40:08 UTC 
blerg. thought I had that in there.
There is already a stuff in gio_wiretypes.h for this. Matter-a-fact
the library interface can already do this.  Seems I just forgot to add
the stuff to gulm_tool.

As for the naming, when this was first added I called all this
resources.  This was deemed to confusing, so it was changed to
services externally.  So there is still stuff that referes to
resources, but everything users see should be services.  (so
"servicelist")
Comment 3 michael conrad tadpol tilstra 2004-10-18 20:58:16 UTC 
should be in 6.0
will get to other trees soonish.
Comment 4 Derek Anderson 2004-12-02 15:29:08 UTC 
This should be added to the usage statement and manpage so we're not
asking each other in a month, "Was that resourse_list or servicelist?"
Comment 5 michael conrad tadpol tilstra 2004-12-02 15:58:20 UTC 
usage and man page fixed in 6.0
Comment 6 Tim Powers 2004-12-03 16:58:46 UTC 
An errata has been issued which should help the problem 
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being 
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, 
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report 
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2004-659.html