Bug 1362674
Summary: | CalDAV fails to recognize "Daily Limit Exceeded" error from Google/GOA | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Christopher Tubbs <ctubbsii> |
Component: | evolution-data-server | Assignee: | Milan Crha <mcrha> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Desktop QE <desktop-qa-list> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.2 | CC: | jkoten, mcrha, mkolaja, vbenes |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | evolution-data-server-3.12.11-37.el7 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2016-11-04 00:25:57 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Christopher Tubbs
2016-08-02 20:08:13 UTC
See also this thread: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/51272/online-accounts-gmail-password-unexpectedly-fails/ Thanks for a bug report. The change you link to was released within the 3.12.6 version, thus it's already part of the current 3.12.11 version in the RHEL. That change is related to CalDAV only, thus for the Google calendars, it doesn't influence mail and other parts. Do you see the prompt for a Google calendar, or for other parts too. I'm unsure from your steps. If you see this on the mail account too, then I'd try to run evolution as: $ CAMEL_DEBUG=imapx:io evolution and then wait until you are prompted for the password for the Mail account. The last few lines should show what failed. Odd. The symptoms I was seeing were identical to what was reported in those issues, so I assumed it had the same cause. I'll try to debug further and provide more information. You might be facing [1], I'm pretty sure. I fixed this upstream and we can backport the change easily. It adds a new translatable string, but I do not consider it a problem. [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761450 (In reply to Milan Crha from comment #5) > You might be facing [1], I'm pretty sure. I fixed this upstream and we can > backport the change easily. It adds a new translatable string, but I do not > consider it a problem. > > [1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761450 It turned out that the change from this bug report was incomplete. I made more upstream fixes there, which I'll backport for the RHEL 7.3 after some testing. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-2206.html |