Bug 1364449
| Summary: | posix: honour fsync flags in posix_do_zerofill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Ravishankar N <ravishankar> | |
| Component: | posix | Assignee: | Ravishankar N <ravishankar> | |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | ||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | |||
| Version: | mainline | CC: | bugs | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged | |
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-3.9.0 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1364497 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-03-27 18:18:00 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1364497 | |||
REVIEW: http://review.gluster.org/15100 (posix: honour fsync flags in posix_do_zerofill) posted (#1) for review on master by Ravishankar N (ravishankar) COMMIT: http://review.gluster.org/15100 committed in master by Pranith Kumar Karampuri (pkarampu) ------ commit cf51bc699646359be92969024a52c225e7ee55a1 Author: Ravishankar N <ravishankar> Date: Fri Aug 5 11:22:18 2016 +0000 posix: honour fsync flags in posix_do_zerofill commit 6d994661db96cad43f26d0d1e2fba31dce9a76f5 introduced fallocate + FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE to do posix_do_zerofill but did not do an fsync if O_SYNC or O_DSYNC fd flags were set. Prashant Pai pointed out performing fallocate(2) does not remove the necessity to do fsyncs if durability is desired: http://linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.narkive.com/bDmrAUlh/fallocate-falloc-fl-punch-hole So fixed it to honour the fd flags. Change-Id: I27ae90b429185d0af29a5e632c4a8b242075a899 BUG: 1364449 Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15100 Reviewed-by: Prashanth Pai <ppai> Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos> CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins.org> Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu> This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-3.9.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-3.9.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] http://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/2016-November/029281.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/ |
commit 6d994661db96cad43f26d0d1e2fba31dce9a76f5 introduced fallocate + FALLOC_FL_ZERO_RANGE to do posix_do_zerofill but did not do an fsync if O_SYNC or O_DSYNC fd flags were set. Prashant Pai pointed out performing fallocate(2) does not remove the necessity to do fsyncs if durability is desired: http://linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.narkive.com/bDmrAUlh/fallocate-falloc-fl-punch-hole