Bug 1365320
| Summary: | Review Request: simplenote - Simplenote.com desktop client | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Robert Bost <rbost> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, rbost |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2016-08-22 18:40:19 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Robert Bost
2016-08-08 23:22:29 UTC
cp -r $RPM_BUILD_DIR/simplenote-electron-%{version}/release/Simplenote-linux-x64/* $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/simplenote/
doesn't seem like true open source.
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #1) > > doesn't seem like true open source. I'm not sure if I follow what you mean by true open source. Can you clarify your concerns and I can check on it? Also, if you can help me understand how that line would lead you to believe its not true open source, I'm happy to adjust it so its a little clearer. Turns out, I'm going to need to make some adjustments to the .spec anyways. Part of the build process requires reaching out to the network to pull down npm dependencies. This is going to need to be removed since koji does not allow for network connections created outside of the standard rpmbuild macros during build. Also, I neglected to state this in my initial update, but this is my first package submission. I'm in search of a sponsor as well and will be reaching out to the devel list soon. I'll be following up with a revision of my SRPM and .spec. Due to the amount of dependencies that would be required by Simplenote this is not going to be accomplished in foreseeable future. I'm focusing on some other packages on my list. |