Bug 1365337

Summary:	Metrics collection fails for OSP providers
Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine	Reporter:	Nandini Chandra <nachandr>
Component:	C&U Capacity and Utilization	Assignee:	Marek Aufart <maufart>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Dave Johnson <dajohnso>
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	urgent
Version:	5.6.0	CC:	dajohnso, david.costakos, gblomqui, jhardy, kmorey, nachandr, nstephan, obarenbo, rrasouli, simaishi, tzumainn
Target Milestone:	GA	Keywords:	Reopened
Target Release:	5.7.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	c&u:openstack
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-01-23 20:58:32 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	Openstack	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nandini Chandra 2016-08-09 00:55:39 UTC

Description of problem:
-----------------------
Metrics collection fails for OSP providers with this error message:

[----] E, [2016-08-08T09:29:27.719760 #15591:b11994] ERROR -- : MIQ(ManageIQ::Providers::Openstack::CloudManager::MetricsCapture#perf_collect_metrics) [realtime] for: [ManageIQ::Providers::Openstack::CloudManage
r::Vm], [58], [lkhomenk_pwr_test] Unhandled exception during perf data collection: [no implicit conversion of String into Integer], class: [TypeError]

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
------------------------
5.6.1


How reproducible:
----------------
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
-------------------
1.Manage OSP provider
2.Enable C&U collection for the provider


Actual results:
---------------
Metrics collection fails for OSP providers.


Expected results:
-----------------
Metrics collection should succeed for OSP providers.


Additional info:
-----------------

Comment 2 Nandini Chandra 2016-08-09 18:57:11 UTC

[----] E, [2016-08-09T13:41:02.553116 #17085:116b998] ERROR -- : MIQ(ManageIQ::Providers::Openstack::CloudManager::MetricsCapture#perf_collect_metrics) [realtime] for: [ManageIQ::Providers::Openstack::CloudManager::Vm], [28], [nachandr-cfme56]   Timings at time of error: {:server_dequeue=>0.004283905029296875, :server_monitor=>0.17510271072387695, :capture_state=>0.3367500305175781, :connect=>0.8643429279327393}
[----] E, [2016-08-09T13:41:02.553481 #17085:116b998] ERROR -- : [Excon::Error::NotAcceptable]: Expected([200, 204, 300]) <=> Actual(406 Not Acceptable)
excon.error.response
  :body          => "{\"error_message\": \"406 Not Acceptable\\n\\nThe server could not comply with the request since it is either malformed or otherwise incorrect.\\n\\n   \"}"
  :cookies       => [
  ]
  :headers       => {
    "Content-Length" => "147"
    "Content-Type"   => "application/json"
    "Date"           => "Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:37:55 GMT"
    "Server"         => "WSGIServer/0.1 Python/2.7.5"
  }
  :host          => "xx.yy.zz.aa"
  :local_address => "192.168.aa.bb"
  :local_port    => 36942
  :path          => "/"
  :port          => 8777
  :reason_phrase => "Not Acceptable"
  :remote_ip     => "10.8.58.50"
  :status        => 406
  :status_line   => "HTTP/1.0 406 Not Acceptable\r\n"
  Method:[rescue in perf_collect_metrics]
[----] E, [2016-08-09T13:41:02.553669 #17085:116b998] ERROR -- : /opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/excon-0.51.0/lib/excon/middlewares/expects.rb:6:in `response_call'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/excon-0.51.0/lib/excon/middlewares/response_parser.rb:8:in `response_call'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/excon-0.51.0/lib/excon/connection.rb:389:in `response'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/excon-0.51.0/lib/excon/connection.rb:253:in `request'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-core-1.42.0/lib/fog/core/connection.rb:81:in `request'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-openstack-0.1.8/lib/fog/openstack.rb:489:in `get_supported_version'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-openstack-0.1.8/lib/fog/openstack/metering.rb:120:in `set_api_path'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-openstack-0.1.8/lib/fog/openstack/metering.rb:112:in `initialize'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-core-1.42.0/lib/fog/core/service.rb:115:in `new'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-core-1.42.0/lib/fog/core/service.rb:115:in `new'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-core-1.42.0/lib/fog/core/services_mixin.rb:16:in `new'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/openstack/openstack_handle/handle.rb:74:in `raw_connect'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/openstack/openstack_handle/handle.rb:49:in `block in raw_connect_try_ssl'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/openstack/openstack_handle/handle.rb:39:in `try_connection'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/openstack/openstack_handle/handle.rb:46:in `raw_connect_try_ssl'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/openstack/openstack_handle/handle.rb:170:in `connect'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/manageiq/providers/openstack/manager_mixin.rb:60:in `connect'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/manageiq/providers/openstack/base_metrics_capture.rb:29:in `block in perf_init_openstack'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/util/extensions/miq-benchmark.rb:11:in `realtime_store'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/util/extensions/miq-benchmark.rb:30:in `realtime_block'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/manageiq/providers/openstack/base_metrics_capture.rb:28:in `perf_init_openstack'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/manageiq/providers/openstack/base_metrics_capture.rb:13:in `perf_collect_metrics'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/metric/ci_mixin/capture.rb:6:in `perf_collect_metrics'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/metric/ci_mixin/capture.rb:157:in `block in perf_capture'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/util/extensions/miq-benchmark.rb:11:in `realtime_store'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/util/extensions/miq-benchmark.rb:30:in `realtime_block'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/metric/ci_mixin/capture.rb:154:in `perf_capture'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/metric/ci_mixin/capture.rb:94:in `perf_capture_realtime'

Comment 3 Nandini Chandra 2016-08-09 19:32:16 UTC

Tested both OSP 6 and OSP 7.

Comment 6 Greg Blomquist 2016-08-09 21:07:06 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1365560 ***

Comment 7 Nandini Chandra 2016-08-10 20:09:13 UTC

Clearing NEEDINFO

Comment 8 Marek Aufart 2016-10-14 11:35:21 UTC

This starts looking not to be a dupe of BZ1365560.

@Nandini, would it be possible get Ceilometer log entries from point when it returned 406 response or provide Fog log with enabled debug with more detailed information?

Comment 9 Nandini Chandra 2017-01-20 19:46:29 UTC

Hi Marek,

Unfortunately, I don't have the appliance on which this issue was seen.

Comment 12 Ronnie Rasouli 2017-05-17 07:26:22 UTC

tested on 5.8.0.14 , metrics can be collected properly from nodes