Bug 1365560
| Summary: | Connection to Ceilometer fails in fog/openstack | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Marek Aufart <maufart> | |
| Component: | Providers | Assignee: | Marek Aufart <maufart> | |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Ola Pavlenko <opavlenk> | |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | urgent | |||
| Version: | 5.6.0 | CC: | benglish, cpelland, ealcaniz, gblomqui, jdeubel, jfrey, jhardy, kmorey, ldomb, maufart, nachandr, nstephan, obarenbo, opavlenk, rrasouli, simaishi, vestival | |
| Target Milestone: | GA | Keywords: | TestOnly, ZStream | |
| Target Release: | 5.7.0 | |||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
| OS: | Unspecified | |||
| Whiteboard: | openstack:c&u | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 5.7.0.0 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 1365907 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2017-01-11 19:49:34 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | Openstack | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | 1384506 | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1337429, 1337676, 1364584, 1365907 | |||
|
Description
Marek Aufart
2016-08-09 14:30:20 UTC
Fog/openstack fix https://github.com/fog/fog-openstack/pull/173 *** Bug 1365337 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Moving back to ON-DEV because there's a MIQ piece that needs to be done here too. Need to bump the version of the fog-openstack gem in the MIQ Gemfile. ManageIQ PR https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/10363 was merged. (In reply to Marek Aufart from comment #2) > Fog/openstack fix https://github.com/fog/fog-openstack/pull/173 Hi, is it possible to this resolved? I don't understand how this BZ is blocked by 1384506. This BZ covers issue with connection to Ceilometer. Ceilometer events can be initiated by several actions, not only instance provision. Also issue from this BZ raised error in evm.log immediately after Ceilometer query attempt. My error looks like the following, however these loglines are from a dupe 1365337, not my appliance:
[----] E, [2016-08-09T13:41:02.553116 #17085:116b998] ERROR -- : MIQ(ManageIQ::Providers::Openstack::CloudManager::MetricsCapture#perf_collect_metrics) [realtime] for: [ManageIQ::Providers::Openstack::CloudManager::Vm], [28], [nachandr-cfme56] Timings at time of error: {:server_dequeue=>0.004283905029296875, :server_monitor=>0.17510271072387695, :capture_state=>0.3367500305175781, :connect=>0.8643429279327393}
[----] E, [2016-08-09T13:41:02.553481 #17085:116b998] ERROR -- : [Excon::Error::NotAcceptable]: Expected([200, 204, 300]) <=> Actual(406 Not Acceptable)
excon.error.response
:body => "{\"error_message\": \"406 Not Acceptable\\n\\nThe server could not comply with the request since it is either malformed or otherwise incorrect.\\n\\n \"}"
:cookies => [
]
:headers => {
"Content-Length" => "147"
"Content-Type" => "application/json"
"Date" => "Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:37:55 GMT"
"Server" => "WSGIServer/0.1 Python/2.7.5"
}
:host => "xx.yy.zz.aa"
:local_address => "192.168.aa.bb"
:local_port => 36942
:path => "/"
:port => 8777
:reason_phrase => "Not Acceptable"
:remote_ip => "10.8.58.50"
:status => 406
:status_line => "HTTP/1.0 406 Not Acceptable\r\n"
Method:[rescue in perf_collect_metrics]
[----] E, [2016-08-09T13:41:02.553669 #17085:116b998] ERROR -- : /opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/excon-0.51.0/lib/excon/middlewares/expects.rb:6:in `response_call'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/excon-0.51.0/lib/excon/middlewares/response_parser.rb:8:in `response_call'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/excon-0.51.0/lib/excon/connection.rb:389:in `response'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/excon-0.51.0/lib/excon/connection.rb:253:in `request'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-core-1.42.0/lib/fog/core/connection.rb:81:in `request'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-openstack-0.1.8/lib/fog/openstack.rb:489:in `get_supported_version'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-openstack-0.1.8/lib/fog/openstack/metering.rb:120:in `set_api_path'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-openstack-0.1.8/lib/fog/openstack/metering.rb:112:in `initialize'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-core-1.42.0/lib/fog/core/service.rb:115:in `new'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-core-1.42.0/lib/fog/core/service.rb:115:in `new'
/opt/rh/cfme-gemset/gems/fog-core-1.42.0/lib/fog/core/services_mixin.rb:16:in `new'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/openstack/openstack_handle/handle.rb:74:in `raw_connect'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/openstack/openstack_handle/handle.rb:49:in `block in raw_connect_try_ssl'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/openstack/openstack_handle/handle.rb:39:in `try_connection'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/openstack/openstack_handle/handle.rb:46:in `raw_connect_try_ssl'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/openstack/openstack_handle/handle.rb:170:in `connect'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/manageiq/providers/openstack/manager_mixin.rb:60:in `connect'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/manageiq/providers/openstack/base_metrics_capture.rb:29:in `block in perf_init_openstack'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/util/extensions/miq-benchmark.rb:11:in `realtime_store'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/util/extensions/miq-benchmark.rb:30:in `realtime_block'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/manageiq/providers/openstack/base_metrics_capture.rb:28:in `perf_init_openstack'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/manageiq/providers/openstack/base_metrics_capture.rb:13:in `perf_collect_metrics'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/metric/ci_mixin/capture.rb:6:in `perf_collect_metrics'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/metric/ci_mixin/capture.rb:157:in `block in perf_capture'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/util/extensions/miq-benchmark.rb:11:in `realtime_store'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/gems/pending/util/extensions/miq-benchmark.rb:30:in `realtime_block'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/metric/ci_mixin/capture.rb:154:in `perf_capture'
/var/www/miq/vmdb/app/models/metric/ci_mixin/capture.rb:94:in `perf_capture_realtime'
@Colin, the error unfortunately looks different to the issue resolved in this BZ. This BZ is looking not to be dupe of BZ1365337 most propably. I assume https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384506 was here by mistake. |