Bug 1365983
| Summary: | [RFE]Very confusing "Add Storage" UI organization | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Storage Console | Reporter: | Jean-Charles Lopez <jelopez> | ||||
| Component: | UI | Assignee: | Karnan <kchidamb> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Filip Balák <fbalak> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | 2 | CC: | asriram, fbalak, japplewh, julim, kchidamb, mkudlej, nthomas, sankarshan, shtripat, vsarmila | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | 2 | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | rhscon-ui-0.0.57-1.el7scon | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: |
Previously, the text on the Add Storage tab was confusing as there was no clear description regarding the storage type. With this update, the text has been updated and a short description about the pools and RBDs is provided to ensure there is no ambiguity.
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-10-19 15:20:59 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1357777 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Comment 2
Nishanth Thomas
2016-08-11 04:08:02 UTC
JC Lopez: 1365983 "Add Storage" Dialog needs to be fixed. Pool creation must be labelled as such and separated from RBD Image creation Created attachment 1194173 [details]
Add Storage -- original design (issue with current text)
Per discussing with JC Lopez, the text is misleading for the object storage selection, thus wording needs to change. There is no issue with the wording for the block storage selection. Please change the 2 storage choices to the following (the block storage option was also revised to be aligned with the Ceph Pool labelling): Ceph Pool Use when you want to create regular RADOS pool. This is the default storage for Ceph. Ceph RBD Raw Block device (RBD) is recommended for traditional applications that expect native block storage. It integrates with Kernel Virtual Machines (KVMs) and allows mounting of block storage devices from Linux or QEMU KVM clients. Data access is via Librados, RBD, and CephFS (POSIX compliant). === Note: Both are prefaced with Ceph to make clear that it's a pool and RBD related to Ceph and not any other storage technologies (since USM will eventually support others, we will want this now so we don't have to change this again in the future). Tested with Server: ceph-ansible-1.0.5-33.el7scon.noarch ceph-installer-1.0.15-2.el7scon.noarch graphite-web-0.9.12-8.1.el7.noarch rhscon-ceph-0.0.42-1.el7scon.x86_64 rhscon-core-selinux-0.0.43-1.el7scon.noarch rhscon-core-0.0.43-1.el7scon.x86_64 rhscon-ui-0.0.57-1.el7scon.noarch Node: calamari-server-1.4.8-1.el7cp.x86_64 ceph-base-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 ceph-common-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 ceph-mon-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 ceph-osd-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 ceph-selinux-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 libcephfs1-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 python-cephfs-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64 rhscon-agent-0.0.19-1.el7scon.noarch rhscon-core-selinux-0.0.43-1.el7scon.noarch and it works as it is expected. --> Verified Doc text looks good. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:2082 |