Bug 1366081

Summary: Cluster Performance Graph Range Selection Popup Broken
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Storage Console Reporter: Jean-Charles Lopez <jelopez>
Component: UIAssignee: kamlesh <kaverma>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Filip Balák <fbalak>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 2CC: fbalak, kchidamb, mkudlej, nthomas, rghatvis, sankarshan, shtripat, vsarmila
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 2   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: rhscon-ui-0.0.57-1.el7scon Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
While checking the cluster system performance, the selection of any elapsed hour range inappropriately displayed tick marks on both the elapsed hour(s) range. With this update, the console displays system performance graph with a tick mark only on the selected elapsed hour(s).
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-10-19 15:21:24 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1357777    

Description Jean-Charles Lopez 2016-08-11 01:10:05 UTC
Description of problem: While trying to adjust the graph range in the ceph cluster overview tab


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.0 (0.0.39)


How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Click on the graph range where it says 'Last 1 Hour'
2. Observe the pop up menu

Actual results:
Both entries are checked whatever value is already selected

Expected results:
If 'Last 1 hour' is selected, then 'Last 24 Hours' shouldn't be
If 'Last 24 hour' is selected, then 'Last 1 Hours' shouldn't be

Additional info:

Comment 4 Nishanth Thomas 2016-08-11 06:32:01 UTC
There is no impact on the functionality, even the UI is misleading. Don't think this is blocker for 2.0. Can be moved out

Comment 5 Jeff Applewhite 2016-08-25 17:13:27 UTC
added to async tracker

Comment 7 Filip Balák 2016-09-26 10:39:02 UTC
Tested with
Server:
ceph-ansible-1.0.5-33.el7scon.noarch
ceph-installer-1.0.15-2.el7scon.noarch
graphite-web-0.9.12-8.1.el7.noarch
rhscon-ceph-0.0.42-1.el7scon.x86_64
rhscon-core-selinux-0.0.43-1.el7scon.noarch
rhscon-core-0.0.43-1.el7scon.x86_64
rhscon-ui-0.0.57-1.el7scon.noarch

Node:
calamari-server-1.4.8-1.el7cp.x86_64
ceph-base-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64
ceph-common-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64
ceph-mon-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64
ceph-osd-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64
ceph-selinux-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64
libcephfs1-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64
python-cephfs-10.2.2-41.el7cp.x86_64
rhscon-agent-0.0.19-1.el7scon.noarch
rhscon-core-selinux-0.0.43-1.el7scon.noarch

and it works as it is expected. --> Verified

Comment 9 Shubhendu Tripathi 2016-10-17 18:54:31 UTC
Doc-text looks good

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2016-10-19 15:21:24 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016:2082