Bug 1367441

Summary: [RHCS-1.3] ceph-objectstore-tool: ability to perform filestore splits offline : new command apply-layout-settings
Product: Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Vikhyat Umrao <vumrao>
Component: RADOSAssignee: Josh Durgin <jdurgin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: ceph-qe-bugs <ceph-qe-bugs>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 1.3.2CC: ceph-eng-bugs, dzafman, hnallurv, jdurgin, kchai, kdreyer, linuxkidd, nlevine, sjust, tserlin, vakulkar
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: 1.3.4   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHEL: ceph-0.94.9-4.el7cp Ubuntu: ceph_0.94.9-5redhat1 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Collection splitting can be now done offline This update adds the `apply-layout-settings` command to the `ceph-objectstore-tool` utility. The new command enables users to perform collection splitting offline on OSD nodes in cases when doing it online would cause too large an impact.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1367442 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2016-12-01 21:38:45 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1394936    

Description Vikhyat Umrao 2016-08-16 12:07:21 UTC
Description of problem:

ceph-objectstore-tool with new option 'apply-layout-settings'


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Red Hat Ceph Storage 1.3.2

Comment 1 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-08-17 14:38:24 UTC
Not yet implemented upstream, re-targeting to 1.3.4

Comment 5 Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) 2016-09-22 16:13:16 UTC
From discussion in the clone bz 1367442, the appropriate upstream tracker here is actually http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17220 .

Still need to know if we should leave this BZ open for RHCS 1.3 or not.

Comment 6 Vikhyat Umrao 2016-09-22 19:17:49 UTC
(In reply to Ken Dreyer (Red Hat) from comment #5)
> From discussion in the clone bz 1367442, the appropriate upstream tracker
> here is actually http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17220 .
> 
> Still need to know if we should leave this BZ open for RHCS 1.3 or not.

Yes I think we should. As we have seen customer issues in 1.3. 
and in upstream it is getting backported to hammer with ticket: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17383

Comment 7 Josh Durgin 2016-09-30 22:23:53 UTC
This can be tested by running a subset of the rados:thrash suite, since https://github.com/ceph/ceph-qa-suite/pull/1192 exercises it.

Comment 11 Vasu Kulkarni 2016-11-29 17:55:22 UTC
Verified in 0.94.9-7.el7cp

http://pulpito.ceph.redhat.com/vasu-2016-11-28_14:28:28-rados:thrash-hammer---basic-multi/

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2016-12-01 21:38:45 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2847.html