| Summary: | Memory report for containers does not show expected values | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | ldomb | ||||
| Component: | C&U Capacity and Utilization | Assignee: | Ari Zellner <azellner> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Dave Johnson <dajohnso> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 5.6.0 | CC: | azellner, jhardy, ldomb, obarenbo, simaishi | ||||
| Target Milestone: | GA | ||||||
| Target Release: | 5.7.0 | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | container | ||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-10-10 16:07:29 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
ldomb
2016-08-16 20:54:20 UTC
Created attachment 1191391 [details]
chargeback
this attachment is a pdf
(In reply to ldomb from comment #0) > the memory total for example for openshift-infra shows 184.4 GB. > > ... > > Actual results: > Memory values do not seem to be based on container usage. Laurent the memory reported (184.4 GB) is based on the summation of all the pods in the project per each hour. So for example if the relevant project has multiple pods that are using 7 Gb of memory (total) for 24 hour, then the we would be charging the use of (7 * 24) 184 Gb. Anyway I'll leave you to investigate this further with Ari. 180 GB is plausible. Possible scenario: openshift-infra had 3 pods running for 24 hours Each pod uses 2.5GB of memory an hour. The chargeback report for that day would show 24 * 3 * 2.5GB = 180gb in mem used. Can I move this to POST? Yes please move post. Thanks for the explanation. |